Literature DB >> 16097228

Anchorage effects of a palatal osseointegrated implant with different fixation: a finite element study.

Fengshan Chen1, Kazuto Terada, Kooji Hanada, Isao Saito.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the anchorage effect of the osseointegrated implant with different fixation types using finite element analysis. Three fixation types were investigated. fixation type 1: implant neck in the oral-palatal cortical bone and implant tip in the cancellous bone; fixation type 2: implant neck in the oral-palatal cortical bone and implant tip in the nasal-palatal cortical bone; fixation type 3: implant neck in the oral-palatal cortical bone and implant tip projecting into the nasal cavity. Three finite element models were constructed. Each consisted of two maxillary second premolars, their associated periodontal ligament (PDL), alveolar bones, palatal bone, palatal implant, and a transpalatal arch. Another model without an implant was used to compare with the previous models. The horizontal force (mesial five N, palatal one N) was loaded at the buccal bracket of each second premolar. The stress was calculated in the PDL and implant surrounding bone. The result showed that the palatal implant could significantly reduce von Mises stress (maximum von Mises stress was reduced 30%) and evenly distribute stress in the PDL. The stress magnitude and distribution in the PDL was almost the same in the three implant models. These results suggest that different implant fixation types have almost the same anchorage effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16097228     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[593:AEOAPO]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  3 in total

1.  Skeletal anchorage for everybody? a questionnaire study on frequency of use and clinical indications in daily practice.

Authors:  N C Bock; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  3D FEM comparison of lingual and labial orthodontics in en masse retraction.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Giuseppe Scuzzo; Angela Arreghini; Ozge Gorgun; Yıldız Oztürk Ortan; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.750

3.  Comparative evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants based on platform-switching concept: influence of diameter, length, thread shape, and in-bone positioning depth on stress-based performance.

Authors:  Luigi Baggi; Michele Di Girolamo; Giuseppe Vairo; Gianpaolo Sannino
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.238

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.