Literature DB >> 16097222

Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition.

Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida1, José Fernando Castanha Henriques, Renato Rodrigues de Almeida, Ursi Weber, James A McNamara.   

Abstract

This prospective clinical investigation evaluates the dentoalveolar and skeletal cephalometric changes produced by the Herbst appliance during treatment of mixed dentition patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Thirty individuals (15 male and 15 female individuals; initial mean age nine years 10 months) were treated with the Herbst appliance for a period of 12 months. For comparison, the records of 30 untreated Class II children (15 boys, 15 girls; initial mean age nine years eight months) were followed without treatment for a period of 12 months. The results indicated that the treatment effects produced in the mixed dentition patients were primarily dentoalveolar in nature. The mandibular incisors were tipped labially, and the maxillary incisors were retruded; a significant increase in mandibular posterior dentoalveolar height occurred, and there was a restriction in the vertical development of the maxillary molars. There was no difference in the forward growth of the maxilla between the two groups. In comparison with the controls, however, the Herbst treatment produced a modest but statistically significant increase in total mandibular length. This increase in total mandibular length, however, was less than that observed in adolescent Herbst patients in other studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16097222     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[540:STEPBT]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of Forsus FRD EZ and Andresen activator in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusions.

Authors:  Fundagül Bilgiç; Güvenç Başaran; Orhan Hamamci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Linda Frye; Ulrich Gross; Jan Hourfar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vasileios F Zymperdikas; Vasiliki Koretsi; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Moschos A Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Three-dimensional skeletal mandibular changes associated with Herbst appliance treatment.

Authors:  B Q Souki; P L C Vilefort; D D Oliveira; I Andrade; A C Ruellas; M S Yatabe; T Nguyen; L Franchi; J A McNamara; L H S Cevidanes
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin Yang; Yafen Zhu; Hu Long; Yang Zhou; Fan Jian; Niansong Ye; Meiya Gao; Wenli Lai
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Prediction of lower incisor proclination during Xbow treatment based on initial cephalometric variables.

Authors:  Tehnia Aziz; Usama Nassar; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Integration of the Herbst and Begg appliance in the management of severe Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Asavari L Desai; Manjunath Hegde; M R Dinesh; B C Amarnath
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-10

8.  Herbst-multibracket appliance treatment: is there an association between lower incisor position changes and the development of labial gingival recessions?

Authors:  S Südwasser; N C Bock; J Jost; S Killat; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 1.938

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.