Literature DB >> 16097136

Carcinogenicity studies of diesel engine exhausts in laboratory animals: a review of past studies and a discussion of future research needs.

Thomas W Hesterberg1, William B Bunn, Roger O McClellan, Georgia A Hart, Charles A Lapin.   

Abstract

Diesel engines play a vital role in world economy, especially in transportation. Exhaust from traditional diesel engines using high-sulfur fuel contains high concentrations of respirable carbonaceous particles with absorbed organic compounds. Recognition that some of these compounds are mutagenic has raised concern for the cancer-causing potential of diesel exhaust exposure. Extensive research addressing this issue has been conducted during the last three decades. This critical review is offered to facilitate an updated assessment of the carcinogenicity of diesel exhaust and to provide a rationale for future animal research of new diesel technology. Life-span bioassays in rats, mice, and Syrian hamsters demonstrated that chronic inhalation of high concentrations of diesel exhaust caused lung tumors in rats but not in mice or Syrian hamsters. In 1989, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) characterized the rat findings as "sufficient evidence of animal carcinogenicity," and, with "limited" evidence from epidemiological studies, classified diesel exhaust Category 2A, a "probable human carcinogen." Subsequent research has shown that similar chronic high concentration exposure to particulate matter generally considered innocuous (such as carbon black and titanium dioxide) also caused lung tumors in rats. Thus, in 2002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concluded that the findings in the rats should not be used to characterize the cancer hazard or quantify the cancer risk of diesel exhaust. Concurrent with the conduct of the health effects studies, progressively more stringent standards have been promulgated for diesel exhaust particles and NOx. Engine manufacturers have responded with new technology diesel (improved engines, fuel injection, fuels, lubricants, and exhaust treatments) to meet the standards. This review concludes with an outline of research to evaluate the health effects of the new technology, research that is consistent with recommendations included in the U.S. EPA 2002 health assessment document. When this research has been completed, it will be appropriate for IARC to evaluate the potential cancer hazard of the new technology diesel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16097136     DOI: 10.1080/10408440590950542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  5 in total

1.  Health effects research and regulation of diesel exhaust: an historical overview focused on lung cancer risk.

Authors:  Thomas W Hesterberg; Christopher M Long; William B Bunn; Charles A Lapin; Roger O McClellan; Peter A Valberg
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Inappropriate exposure data and misleading calculations invalidate the estimates of health risk for airborne titanium dioxide and carbon black nanoparticle exposures in the workplace.

Authors:  Peter Morfeld; Robert J McCunney; Len Levy; Ishrat S Chaudhuri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Chronic social stress and susceptibility to concentrated ambient fine particles in rats.

Authors:  Jane E Clougherty; Christina A Rossi; Joy Lawrence; Mark S Long; Edgar A Diaz; Robert H Lim; Bruce McEwen; Petros Koutrakis; John J Godleski
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  The influence of diesel exhaust on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced DNA damage, gene expression, and tumor initiation in Sencar mice in vivo.

Authors:  Lauren A Courter; Andreas Luch; Tamara Musafia-Jeknic; Volker M Arlt; Kay Fischer; Robert Bildfell; Cliff Pereira; David H Phillips; Miriam C Poirier; William M Baird
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 5.  Potential hazards associated with combustion of bio-derived versus petroleum-derived diesel fuel.

Authors:  Jürgen Bünger; Jürgen Krahl; Olaf Schröder; Lasse Schmidt; Götz A Westphal
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.635

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.