BACKGROUND: Global assessment of functioning, quality of life (QOL) and patient needs have been discussed as inter-related domains important for care planning and outcome assessment in care for the severely mentally ill. The study was conducted to investigate relationships of functioning level, subjective QOL and unmet needs in a cross-sectional study of 404 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders in five European centres with a focus on the patient group with low function scores. METHODS: Patient groups with low, medium and high function scores were compared with regard to subjective QOL and unmet needs. QOL variability was assessed in subgroups according to function scores. Regression analyses were used to examine the impact of illness-related and other unmet patient needs on QOL. The influence of individual needs in the low and medium/high function score subgroup was compared. RESULTS: QOL increased and unmet needs decreased from the low to high function score subgroup. There was greater QOL variability in patients with low function scores compared to those with medium and high function scores, with some low-function score patients having relatively high QOL. In the low function score subgroup, both illness-related and other needs had an impact on QOL, whereas non-illness needs influenced QOL in medium and high function score patients. CONCLUSION: Scores of functioning level, in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, are related to QOL in a complex way, and types of unmet need impinge on the relationship. In order to improve QOL in people with low function scores, both illness-related and other needs should be met.
BACKGROUND: Global assessment of functioning, quality of life (QOL) and patient needs have been discussed as inter-related domains important for care planning and outcome assessment in care for the severely mentally ill. The study was conducted to investigate relationships of functioning level, subjective QOL and unmet needs in a cross-sectional study of 404 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders in five European centres with a focus on the patient group with low function scores. METHODS:Patient groups with low, medium and high function scores were compared with regard to subjective QOL and unmet needs. QOL variability was assessed in subgroups according to function scores. Regression analyses were used to examine the impact of illness-related and other unmet patient needs on QOL. The influence of individual needs in the low and medium/high function score subgroup was compared. RESULTS: QOL increased and unmet needs decreased from the low to high function score subgroup. There was greater QOL variability in patients with low function scores compared to those with medium and high function scores, with some low-function score patients having relatively high QOL. In the low function score subgroup, both illness-related and other needs had an impact on QOL, whereas non-illness needs influenced QOL in medium and high function score patients. CONCLUSION: Scores of functioning level, in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, are related to QOL in a complex way, and types of unmet need impinge on the relationship. In order to improve QOL in people with low function scores, both illness-related and other needs should be met.
Authors: L Gaite; J L Vázquez-Barquero; A Arrizabalaga Arrizabalaga; A H Schene; B Welcher; G Thornicroft; M Ruggeri; E Vázquez-Bourgon; M Pérez Retuerto; M Leese Journal: Br J Psychiatry Suppl Date: 2000
Authors: Graham Thornicroft; Michele Tansella; Thomas Becker; Martin Knapp; Morven Leese; Aart Schene; José Luis Vazquez-Barquero Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Karin Landolt; Wulf Rössler; Tom Burns; Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross; Silvana Galderisi; Jan Libiger; Dieter Naber; Eske M Derks; René S Kahn; W Wolfgang Fleischhacker Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Muhammad Ajmal Zahid; J U Ohaeri; A S Elshazly; M A Basiouny; H M Hamoda; R Varghese Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: A G Nevarez-Flores; K Sanderson; M Breslin; V J Carr; V A Morgan; A L Neil Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 6.892