Literature DB >> 16096366

Elevated sphingomyelinase activity and ceramide concentration in serum of patients undergoing high dose spatially fractionated radiation treatment: implications for endothelial apoptosis.

Sabapathi Sathishkumar1, Boris Boyanovsky, Alexander A Karakashian, Krassimira Rozenova, Natalia V Giltiay, Mahesh Kudrimoti, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Mansoor M Ahmed, Mariana Nikolova-Karakashian.   

Abstract

Spatially fractionated high dose (grid) radiation treatment (SFGRT) involves irradiation of bulky tumors with one high, grid-delivered, dose of 15 Gy followed by multiple consecutive doses of 2 Gy each. The goal of this study is to determine the effect of this treatment on serum ceramide content and to investigate possible involvement of ceramide in tumor regression after SFGRT. Serum ceramide and Secretory SMase (S-SMase) were quantified in 11 patients before and at 24, 48 and 72 h after the dose of 15 Gy. Furthermore, LDL particles were isolated from the serum and their apoptotic ability was tested in human endothelial cells by TUNEL assay. Sixty seven per cent (6/8) of the patients with partial (PR) or complete (CR) response showed statistically significant increase in serum ceramide levels. Of the nonresponders in the study, none showed an elevation in ceramide. S-SMase activity underwent similar changes. LDL particles from serum of patients collected 72 hours after SFGRT sensitized the endothelial cells to undergo apoptosis in response to 5 Gy radiation that by itself had only modest effect on cell death. Independent elevation of ceramide content of endothelial cells that were otherwise resistant to radiation-induced cell death also was sufficient to sensitize these cells to apoptosis. Serum S-SMase activity and ceramide content increase following SFGRT and correlate with the clinical response. Apparently, these changes are in the LDL-associated ceramide and may contribute to better tumor reduction after SFGRT, due to the ability of LDL-derived ceramide to sensitize endothelial cells for apoptosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16096366     DOI: 10.4161/cbt.4.9.1915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


  41 in total

1.  Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature.

Authors:  Gregory J Czarnota; Raffi Karshafian; Peter N Burns; Shun Wong; Azza Al Mahrouki; Justin W Lee; Amanda Caissie; William Tran; Christina Kim; Melissa Furukawa; Emily Wong; Anoja Giles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Exploiting sensitization windows of opportunity in hyper and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Anish Prasanna; Mansoor M Ahmed; Mohammed Mohiuddin; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR): Impact on the Immune System and Potential for Future Therapeutic Modulation.

Authors:  Adam S Reese; Steven J Feigenberg; Azmat Husain; Tonya J Webb; Petr F Hausner; Martin J Edelman; Josephine Feliciano; Katherine H Tkaczuk; Navesh K Sharma
Journal:  Mol Cell Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01-01

Review 4.  Cancer treatment strategies targeting sphingolipid metabolism.

Authors:  Babak Oskouian; Julie D Saba
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Secretory sphingomyelinase (S-SMase) activity is elevated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Beatriz Y Hanaoka; Michelle J Ormseth; C Michael Stein; Daipayan Banerjee; Mariana Nikolova-Karakashian; Leslie J Crofford
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Effective spatially fractionated GRID radiation treatment planning for a passive grid block.

Authors:  A Nobah; M Mohiuddin; S Devic; B Moftah
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Spatially fractionated radiation induces cytotoxicity and changes in gene expression in bystander and radiation adjacent murine carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Rajalakshmi S Asur; Sunil Sharma; Ching-Wei Chang; Jose Penagaricano; Indira M Kommuru; Eduardo G Moros; Peter M Corry; Robert J Griffin
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 8.  Roles and regulation of secretory and lysosomal acid sphingomyelinase.

Authors:  Russell W Jenkins; Daniel Canals; Yusuf A Hannun
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.315

9.  In vivo effects of lattice radiation therapy on local and distant lung cancer: potential role of immunomodulation.

Authors:  Saravana Kanagavelu; Seema Gupta; Xiaodong Wu; Sakhi Philip; Max M Wattenberg; James W Hodge; Mariluz D Couto; Kristina D Chung; Mansoor M Ahmed
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  Sphingomyelin metabolism at the plasma membrane: implications for bioactive sphingolipids.

Authors:  Delphine Milhas; Christopher J Clarke; Yusuf A Hannun
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 4.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.