Literature DB >> 16096261

Sequence and hydropathy profile analysis of two classes of secondary transporters.

Juke S Lolkema1, Dirk-Jan Slotboom.   

Abstract

A structural class in the MemGen classification of membrane proteins is a set of evolutionary related proteins sharing a similar global fold. A structural class contains both closely related pairs of proteins for which homology is clear from sequence comparison and very distantly related pairs, for which it is not possible to establish homology based on sequence similarity alone. In the latter case the evolutionary link is based on hydropathy profile analysis. Here, we use these evolutionary related sets of proteins to analyze the relationship between E-values in BLAST searches, sequence similarities in multiple sequence alignments and structural similarities in hydropathy profile analyses. Two structural classes of secondary transporters termed ST[3], which includes the Ion Transporter (IT) superfamily and ST[4], which includes the DAACS family (TC# 2.A.23) were extracted from the NCBI protein database. ST[3] contains 2051 unique sequences distributed over 32 families and 59 subfamilies. ST[4] is a smaller class containing 399 unique sequences distributed over 2 families and 7 subfamilies. One subfamily in ST[4] contains a new class of binding protein dependent secondary transporters. Comparison of the averaged hydropathy profiles of the subfamilies in ST[3] and ST[4] revealed that the two classes represent different folds. Divergence of the sequences in ST[4] is much smaller than observed in ST[3], suggesting different constraints on the proteins during evolution. Analysis of the correlation between the evolutionary relationship of pairs of proteins in a class and the BLAST E-value revealed that: (i) the BLAST algorithm is unable to pick up the majority of the links between proteins in structural class ST[3], (ii) "low complexity filtering" and "composition based statistics" improve the specificity, but strongly reduce the sensitivity of BLAST searches for distantly related proteins, indicating that these filters are too stringent for the proteins analyzed, and (iii) the E-value cut-off, which may be used to evaluate evolutionary significance of a hit in a BLAST search is very different for the two structural classes of membrane proteins.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16096261     DOI: 10.1080/09687860500063324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Membr Biol        ISSN: 0968-7688            Impact factor:   2.857


  6 in total

Review 1.  The 2-hydroxycarboxylate transporter family: physiology, structure, and mechanism.

Authors:  Iwona Sobczak; Juke S Lolkema
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 2.  Membrane protein prediction methods.

Authors:  Marco Punta; Lucy R Forrest; Henry Bigelow; Andrew Kernytsky; Jinfeng Liu; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  AlignMe--a membrane protein sequence alignment web server.

Authors:  Marcus Stamm; René Staritzbichler; Kamil Khafizov; Lucy R Forrest
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Structural perspectives on secondary active transporters.

Authors:  Olga Boudker; Grégory Verdon
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 14.819

5.  Alignment of helical membrane protein sequences using AlignMe.

Authors:  Marcus Stamm; René Staritzbichler; Kamil Khafizov; Lucy R Forrest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genome-Wide Transcriptional Excavation of Dipsacus asperoides Unmasked both Cryptic Asperosaponin Biosynthetic Genes and SSR Markers.

Authors:  Jian-Ying Wang; Yan-Li Liang; Mei-Rong Hai; Jun-Wen Chen; Zheng-Jie Gao; Qian-Qian Hu; Guang-Hui Zhang; Sheng-Chao Yang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 5.753

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.