Literature DB >> 16094828

Protective efficacy of intermediate and intermediate plus infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) vaccines against very virulent IBDV in commercial broilers.

S Rautenschlein1, Ch Kraemer, J Vanmarcke, E Montiel.   

Abstract

The evolution of very virulent (vv) infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) has led to significant economic losses in many poultry-producing areas. Despite vigorous vaccination strategies, IBDV has been difficult to control. The protective efficacy of IBDV vaccines is traditionally evaluated in specific pathogen-free (SPF) chickens. But under field conditions, residual maternal antibody (mAb) levels may interfere with vaccine efficacy. In this study, commercial broilers with various levels of maternally derived antibodies were vaccinated with IBDV vaccines of different virulence (vaccines 1-3, intermediate; vaccine 4, intermediate plus). At an average maternal virus-neutralizing antibody (mAb) level of log2 10.8 (range 7.6-11.6) at day of vaccination, only the intermediate plus vaccine induced IBDV antibodies after 18 days, while the other intermediate vaccines did not. At average mAb levels of log2 6.7 (range 5.6-8.6) at day of vaccination, all vaccines induced circulating antibodies, although the onset of antibody production differed significantly between strains (P < 0.05). While the intermediate plus vaccine induced enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay antibody levels already at 14 days postvaccination (PV), the intermediate vaccines induced significant antibody levels 28 (vaccines 1, 2) and 35 (vaccine 3) days PV. The time of IBDV antibody induction correlated with the onset of bursa lesions. The severity of lesions was comparable between vaccines 1, 3, and 4 (lesion score 4), while vaccine 2 induce only mild lesions of score 1 in 23% of the tested birds. Despite the induction of antibodies, none of the tested vaccines fully protected against challenge with vvIBDV. All challenged birds had either significantly higher bursal lesion scores or a higher IBDV antigen load in the bursa or sometimes both in comparison with nonchallenged birds (P < 0.05). Our study demonstrates that the evaluation of IBDV-vaccine efficacy is difficult in commercial broilers. For the first time, it was shown that the onset of bursa lesions and recovery of IBDV-vaccinated broilers is delayed in the presence of mAb in comparison with SPF chickens but not suppressed as previously assumed. At the time of challenge, vaccinated birds may still have significant bursa lesions and may lack target cells for IBDV-challenge virus. To be able to evaluate vaccine efficacy in commercial broilers, parameters such as intrabursal IBDV-antigen load should also be considered in conjunction with bursa lesion scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094828     DOI: 10.1637/7310-112204R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  18 in total

Review 1.  Current status of veterinary vaccines.

Authors:  Els N T Meeusen; John Walker; Andrew Peters; Paul-Pierre Pastoret; Gregers Jungersen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Risk factors associated with infectious bursal disease vaccination failures in broiler farms in Kenya.

Authors:  Wanzila Usyu Mutinda; Philip Njeru Nyaga; Paul Gichohi Mbuthia; Lilly Caroline Bebora; Gerald Muchemi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Immunogenicity and Efficacy Evaluation of Vero Cell-Adapted Infectious Bursal Disease Virus LC-75 Vaccine Strain.

Authors:  Wakjira Kebede; Molalegne Bitew; Fufa Dawo Bari; Bedaso Mammo Edao; Hawa Mohammed; Martha Yami; Belayneh Getachew; Takele Abayneh; Esayas Gelaye
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2021-10-01

4.  Evaluation of immune responses by live infectious bursal disease vaccines to avoid vaccination failures.

Authors:  P Jakka; Y K Reddy; J J Kirubaharan; N D J Chandran
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2014-05-21

5.  Efficacy of VP2 protein expressed in E. coli for protection against highly virulent infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Omar; Chong Lee Kim; Mohd Hair Bejo; Aini Ideris
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.672

6.  Immunoreactivity and morphological changes of bursal follicles in chickens infected with vaccine or wild-type strains of the infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  Naoyuki Aihara; Noriyuki Horiuchi; Nanase Hikichi; Mariko Ochiai; Yuko Hosoda; Yoko Ishikawa; Yoko Shimazaki; Koji Oishi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Synbiotic enhances immune responses against infectious bronchitis, infectious bursal disease, Newcastle disease and avian influenza in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Alireza Talebi; Amir Amani; Masoud Pourmahmod; Poya Saghaei; Reza Rezaie
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 1.054

8.  Newcastle Disease Virus Vectored Bivalent Vaccine against Virulent Infectious Bursal Disease and Newcastle Disease of Chickens.

Authors:  Sohini Dey; Madhan Mohan Chellappa; Dinesh C Pathak; Satish Gaikwad; Kalpana Yadav; Saravanan Ramakrishnan; Vikram N Vakharia
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-26

9.  Protective oral vaccination against infectious bursal disease virus using the major viral antigenic protein VP2 produced in Pichia pastoris.

Authors:  Omid Taghavian; Holger Spiegel; Rüdiger Hauck; Hafez M Hafez; Rainer Fischer; Stefan Schillberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni-host interaction in broilers.

Authors:  Li Li; Colin Pielsticker; Zifeng Han; Tereza Kubasová; Ivan Rychlik; Bernd Kaspers; Silke Rautenschlein
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.181

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.