Literature DB >> 16094512

Venous drainage method for cardiopulmonary bypass in single-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery: siphon and vacuum-assisted drainage.

Noriyuki Murai1, Mamiko Cho, Shuichi Okada, Tomohumi Chiba, Masahito Saito, Souichi Shioguchi, Shigeyoshi Gon, Ikkoku Hata, Naoya Yamauchi, Takao Imazeki.   

Abstract

Vacuum-assisted venous drainage (VAVD) can facilitate venous drainage in single-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery (SAMICS). We retrospectively examined the use of VAVD in SAMICS in our hospital for this report. VAVD has been performed according to a VAVD protocol since 2000. Data from the 110 patients who underwent SAMICS in our institute from January 2000 to June 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. The total negative pressure was maintained at no greater than -90 mmHg. Indications for use of VAVD (protocol) were: insufficient venous return by siphon drainage alone, persistent elevation of the central venous pressure (CVP), and, insufficient venous drainage in the operative field. Of 110 patients, 97 (88.2%) underwent VAVD. The body surface area was significantly smaller in the group that did not require VAVD (the non-VAVD group) than in the group that did (VAVD group) (VAVD group versus non-VAVD group: 1.586 +/- 0.175 versus 1.408 +/- 0.153 m(2), P < 0.001). Other factors such as cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, postoperative maximum lactate dehydrogenase, postoperative maximum creatinine, postoperative maximum blood urea nitrogen were similar in the two groups. VAVD is necessary in SAMICS except for small patients. A VAVD total negative pressure of -90 mmHg did not hinder operative procedures or cause clinical problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094512     DOI: 10.1007/s10047-005-0288-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Artif Organs        ISSN: 1434-7229            Impact factor:   1.731


  19 in total

1.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: mini-sternotomy with extended transseptal approach.

Authors:  A M Gillinov; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1999-07

2.  Vacuum assisted cardiopulmonary bypass in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: its feasibility and effects on hemolysis.

Authors:  H Shin; R Yozu; T Maehara; T Matayoshi; M Morita; Y Kawai; T Yamada; S Kawada
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.094

3.  Assisted venous drainage cardiopulmonary bypass in congenital heart surgery.

Authors:  J W Ojito; R L Hannan; K Miyaji; J A White; T W McConaghey; J P Jacobs; R P Burke
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Ministernotomy versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  A Aris; M L Cámara; J Montiel; L J Delgado; J Galán; H Litvan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Cerebrovascular accident after vacuum-assisted venous drainage in a Fontan patient: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  M Jahangiri; A Rayner; B Keogh; C Lincoln
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Minimally invasive mitral valve operations.

Authors:  J L Navia; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Vacuum assisted venous drainage does not increase trauma to blood cells.

Authors:  X M Mueller; H T Tevaearai; J Horisberger; M Augstburger; M Burki; L K von Segesser
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  Port-access cardiac surgery. Experience with 34 cases at Keio University Hospital.

Authors:  R Yozu; H Shin; T Maehara; Y Iino; A Mitsumaru; S Kawada
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-06

9.  Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: a prospective study in 120 patients.

Authors:  H E Mächler; P Bergmann; M Anelli-Monti; D Dacar; P Rehak; I Knez; L Salaymeh; E Mahla; B Rigler
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair.

Authors:  L H Cohn; D H Adams; G S Couper; D P Bichell; D M Rosborough; S P Sears; S F Aranki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Vacuum-assisted venous drainage and gaseous microemboli in cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Shigang Wang; Akif Undar
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2008-12

Review 2.  Vacuum-assisted drainage in cardiopulmonary bypass: advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Elio Barreto de Carvalho Filho; Fernando Augusto de Lima Marson; Loredana Nilkenes Gomes da Costa; Nilson Antunes
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.