Literature DB >> 16094506

The ability of history and a negative cough stress test to detect occult stress incontinence in patients undergoing surgical repair of advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Steven Kleeman1, Brett Vassallo, Jeffery Segal, Melanie Hungler, Mickey Karram.   

Abstract

To determine if a negative preoperative reduction cough stress test is a viable method of detecting occult stress incontinence or urge incontinence in women undergoing surgical repair of advanced pelvic organ prolapse. A retrospective chart review was done on all patients who denied any urinary complaints and had repair of advanced pelvic organ prolapse, grade two or greater, without the addition of an anti-incontinence procedure. Additionally patients had a simple office filling study done at the time of initial examination that failed to show the sign of stress incontinence or detrusor instability. Any urinary dysfunction that developed postoperatively was noted. A total of 53 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, one patient (1.9%) developed genuine stress incontinence, and one patient complained of urgency (1.9%). Patients without urinary complaints and a negative office filling study, who were present for surgical correction of advanced pelvic organ prolapse, have a low incidence of developing occult stress incontinence. Further work-up would not be cost effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094506     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-1367-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  7 in total

1.  Predicting postoperative urinary incontinence development in women undergoing operation for genitourinary prolapse.

Authors:  A Bergman; P P Koonings; C A Ballard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The effect of posterior wall support defects on urodynamic indices in stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  D L Myers; C A Lasala; J W Hogan; P L Rosenblatt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The effect of uterovaginal prolapse on urethrovesical pressure dynamics.

Authors:  D A Richardson; A E Bent; D R Ostergard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-08-15       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Prevalence of abnormal urodynamic test results in continent women with severe genitourinary prolapse.

Authors:  B A Rosenzweig; S Pushkin; D Blumenfeld; N N Bhatia
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  A 25-year experience with 519 anterior colporrhaphy procedures.

Authors:  R P Beck; S McCormick; L Nordstrom
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  The mechanism of urinary continence in women with severe uterovaginal prolapse: results of barrier studies.

Authors:  R C Bump; J A Fantl; W G Hurt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group.

Authors:  J S Uebersax; J F Wyman; S A Shumaker; D K McClish; J A Fantl
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.696

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Predictor of de novo stress urinary incontinence following TVM procedure: a further analysis of preoperative voiding function.

Authors:  Masato Kuribayashi; Yasuhide Kitagawa; Kazutaka Narimoto; Satoko Urata; Shohei Kawaguchi; Mikio Namiki
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Should prophylactic anti-incontinence procedures be performed at the time of prolapse repair? Systematic review.

Authors:  Priscila Katsumi Matsuoka; Aparecida Maria Pacetta; Edmund Chada Baracat; Jorge Milhem Haddad
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Occult incontinence as predictor for postoperative stress urinary incontinence following pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Rune Svenningsen; Ellen Borstad; Anny Elisabeth Spydslaug; Leiv Sandvik; Anne Cathrine Staff
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Ringing the changes in evaluation of urogenital prolapse.

Authors:  Sushma Srikrishna; Dudley Robinson; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Protocol for the CUPIDO trials; multicenter randomized controlled trials to assess the value of combining prolapse surgery and incontinence surgery in patients with genital prolapse and evident stress incontinence (CUPIDO I) and in patients with genital prolapse and occult stress incontinence (CUPIDO II).

Authors:  Annemarie van der Steen; Marinus van der Ploeg; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Huub van der Vaart; Jan-Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 6.  Is there any evidence to advocate SUI prevention in continent women undergoing prolapse repair? An overview.

Authors:  B Fatton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-10-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.