Literature DB >> 16092719

Overview of inhalation exposure techniques: strengths and weaknesses.

Jürgen Pauluhn1.   

Abstract

The vast majority of toxicity studies and risk evaluations deal with single chemicals. Due to the growing interest in potential human health risks originating from exposure to environmental pollutants or lifestyle-related complex chemical mixtures, well thought-out tailor-made mechanistic inhalation toxicity studies have been performed. In contrast to the complex mixtures potentially encountered from hazardous waste sites, drinking water disinfection by-products, natural flavoring complexes or the cumulative intake of food additives and pesticide residues, the scientific evaluation of complex airborne mixtures, such as acid aerosols, atmospheres produced by combustion or thermolysis, e.g. residual oil fly ash (ROFA), diesel and gasoline exhaust, and tobacco smoke, or volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) in residential areas, to mention but a few, is a daunting challenge for experimental toxicologists. These challenges include the controlled in situ generation of exposure atmospheres, the compositions of which are often process-determined and metastable. This means that volatile agents may partition with liquid aerosols or be adsorbed onto surfaces of solid aerosols. Similarly, the nature and composition of test atmospheres might change continuously through oxidation and aging of constituents or coagulation of particles. This, in turn, poses additional challenges to the analytical characterization of such complex test atmospheres, including the identification of potential experimental artifacts. Accordingly, highly standardized and controlled inhalation studies are required for hazard identification of complex mixtures and the results of inhalation studies have to be analyzed judiciously due to the great number of experimental variables. These variables may be related to technical issues or to the specific features of the animal model. Although inhalation exposure of animals mimics human exposure best, not all results obtained under such rigorous test conditions might necessarily also occur under real-life exposure conditions. In addition, to simulate experimentally specific use or exposure patterns may impose a particular challenge to traditional approaches in terms of relevant exposure metrics and the analytes chosen to characterize exposure atmospheres. This paper addresses major developments in the discipline of inhalation toxicology with particular emphasis on the state-of-the-art testing of complex mixtures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16092719     DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2005.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0940-2993


  7 in total

1.  Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies.

Authors:  Alexandra Noël; Christina M Verret; Farhana Hasan; Slawomir Lomnicki; John Morse; Annette Robichaud; Arthur L Penn
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy.

Authors:  Daniel Krewski; Daniel Acosta; Melvin Andersen; Henry Anderson; John C Bailar; Kim Boekelheide; Robert Brent; Gail Charnley; Vivian G Cheung; Sidney Green; Karl T Kelsey; Nancy I Kerkvliet; Abby A Li; Lawrence McCray; Otto Meyer; Reid D Patterson; William Pennie; Robert A Scala; Gina M Solomon; Martin Stephens; James Yager; Lauren Zeise
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.393

3.  Inhalation of particulate matter containing free radicals leads to decreased vascular responsiveness associated with an altered pulmonary function.

Authors:  Ashlyn C Harmon; Alexandra Noël; Balamurugan Subramanian; Zakia Perveen; Merilyn H Jennings; Yi-Fan Chen; Arthur L Penn; Kelsey Legendre; Daniel B Paulsen; Kurt J Varner; Tammy R Dugas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 5.125

Review 4.  Occupational and environmental causes of lung cancer.

Authors:  R William Field; Brian L Withers
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.878

5.  Breath-by-breath measurement of particle deposition in the lung of spontaneously breathing rats.

Authors:  S Karrasch; G Eder; I Bolle; A Tsuda; H Schulz
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-07-30

6.  Mosquito coil exposure associated with small cell lung cancer: A report of three cases.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Hui-Wei Qi; Yu-Ping Sun; Hui-Kang Xie; Cai-Cun Zhou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Dry Powder and Nebulized Aerosol Inhalation of Pharmaceuticals Delivered to Mice Using a Nose-only Exposure System.

Authors:  Jonathan E Phillips; Xuxia Zhang; James A Johnston
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 1.355

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.