Literature DB >> 16092321

Risk of nosocomial bacteria transmission: evaluation of cleaning methods of probes used for routine ultrasonography.

T O Bello1, S S Taiwo, D P Oparinde, W O Hassan, J O Amure.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There exists a small but definite risk of nosocomial infection transmission attributable to ultrasonography probes and coupling gels.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to ascertain whether the current method of probe disinfection in between patients is adequate to prevent cross infection, and to determine the best and safest method of probe disinfection applicable during routine ultrasonography in our institution. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: Forty consecutive patients sent for routine ultrasonography at the Radiology Department of our institution in the month of January 2004 were studied. Each patient had a standardized ultrasound scan of the abdomen, after which swabs were taken from the surface of the unclean probe and after probe disinfection by single and double paper wipe cleaning method. The swabs were cultured on Blood agar to determine the characteristics of the colony forming units (CFU). RESULT: Forty four bacterial isolates were recovered from 37 patients who cultured positive, with MRSA constituting 36.4 %, MRCONS 22.7 %, MSSA 13.6 %, MSCONS 13.6%, Klebsiella spp 9.1% and Proteus mirabilis 4.6%. The average CFU transmitted by the unclean probe was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that transmitted by the probe after single or double paper wipe. Also, the average CFU transmitted following single and double paper wipe, in the inpatients was significantly higher (P<0.05) than in the outpatients.
CONCLUSION: Single paper wipe is adequate for outpatients, but for inpatients, especially those with high risk of cross infection, double paper wipe is preferred with probe thoroughly wiped until visibly clean.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16092321     DOI: 10.4314/wajm.v24i2.28190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West Afr J Med        ISSN: 0189-160X


  6 in total

1.  Degradation of ultrasound probes caused by disinfection with alcohol.

Authors:  Harumi Koibuchi; Yasutomo Fujii; Kazuhiko Kotani; Kei Konno; Hiroaki Matsunaga; Michiaki Miyamoto; Nobuyuki Taniguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Evaluation of procedures for decontaminating ultrasound probes.

Authors:  Shunji Hayashi; Harumi Koibuchi; Nobuyuki Taniguchi; Yoshikazu Hirai
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Comparison of methods for evaluating bacterial contamination of ultrasound probes.

Authors:  Harumi Koibuchi; Shunji Hayashi; Kazuhiko Kotani; Yasutomo Fujii; Kei Konno; Yoshikazu Hirai; Nobuyuki Taniguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 4.  [Hygiene aspects in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia].

Authors:  P Marhofer; K Schebesta; D Marhofer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Clinical review: Bedside lung ultrasound in critical care practice.

Authors:  Bélaïd Bouhemad; Mao Zhang; Qin Lu; Jean-Jacques Rouby
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Emergency department ultrasound probe infection control: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Hamid Shokoohi; Paige Armstrong; Ryan Tansek
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2015-01-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.