Literature DB >> 16092057

Targeting vascular risk in patients with metabolic syndrome but without diabetes.

Vasilios G Athyros1, Dimitri P Mikhailidis, Athanasios A Papageorgiou, Triandafillos P Didangelos, Athanasia Peletidou, Drosia Kleta, Asterios Karagiannis, Anna I Kakafika, Konstantinos Tziomalos, Moses Elisaf.   

Abstract

There are no prospective data on the effect of a multitargeted treatment approach on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction in nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Furthermore, the optimal hypolipidemic drug treatment in these patients remains controversial. In this prospective, randomized, open-label, intention-to-treat, and parallel study, 300 nondiabetic patients with MetS, free of CVD at baseline, were studied for a period of 12 months. Age- and sex-matched subjects without MetS (n = 100) acted as controls. All patients received lifestyle advice and a stepwise-implemented drug treatment of hypertension, impaired fasting glucose, and obesity. For hypolipidemic treatment, the patients were randomly allocated to 3 treatment groups: atorvastatin (n = 100, 20 mg/d), micronized fenofibrate (n = 100, 200 mg/d), and both drugs (n = 100). Clinical and laboratory parameters, including the lipid profile and C-reactive protein (CRP), were assessed at the baseline and at the end of the study. The primary end point was the proportion of patients not having MetS or its component features at the end of the 12-month treatment period. The secondary end points were the difference in 10-year CVD risk (Prospective Cardiovascular Munster risk calculator) and the degree of CRP reduction. By the end of the study, 76% of the patients no longer had MetS, and 46% had only one diagnostic MetS factor. The estimated 10-year (Prospective Cardiovascular Munster) risk of all patients with MetS at baseline was 14.6%. This was reduced in the atorvastatin group to 6.4%, in the fenofibrate group to 9.2%, and in the combination group to 5.5% (P < .0001 for all vs baseline). The 10-year risks of the atorvastatin and combination groups were not different from that of the control group (5.0%). C-reactive protein was significantly reduced in all treatment groups, with the atorvastatin and combination groups having the greatest reduction (65% and 68%, respectively, P < .01 vs the fenofibrate group, 44%). Lipid values were significantly improved in all 3 treatment groups, with those on the combined treatment attaining lipid targets to a greater extent than those in the other 2 groups. A target-driven and intensified intervention aimed at multiple risk factors in nondiabetic patients with MetS substantially offsets its component factors and significantly reduces the estimated CVD risk. The atorvastatin-fenofibrate combination had the most beneficial effect on all lipid parameters and significantly improved their CVD risk status. Atorvastatin and combination treatment were more effective than fenofibrate alone in reducing CRP levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16092057     DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2005.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolism        ISSN: 0026-0495            Impact factor:   8.694


  15 in total

1.  Association of gene variants with lipid levels in response to fenofibrate is influenced by metabolic syndrome status.

Authors:  Mary F Feitosa; Ping An; Jose M Ordovas; Shamika Ketkar; Paul N Hopkins; Robert J Straka; Donna K Arnett; Ingrid B Borecki
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.162

2.  Cardiovascular and economic outcomes after initiation of lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin vs simvastatin in an employed population.

Authors:  Ross J Simpson; James Signorovitch; Howard Birnbaum; Jasmina Ivanova; Cristina Connolly; Yohanne Kidolezi; Andreas Kuznik
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 3.  Do statins reduce events in patients with metabolic syndrome?

Authors:  Sarah P Towne; Eddie Thara
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Impact of Statin Therapy on Plasma Uric Acid Concentrations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Derosa; Pamela Maffioli; Željko Reiner; Luis E Simental-Mendía; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Pharmacological interventions for non-alcohol related fatty liver disease (NAFLD): an attempted network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rosa Lombardi; Simona Onali; Douglas Thorburn; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Emmanuel Tsochatzis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-30

Review 6.  Management of dyslipidemias with fibrates, alone and in combination with statins: role of delayed-release fenofibric acid.

Authors:  Elisavet Moutzouri; Anastazia Kei; Moses S Elisaf; Haralampos J Milionis
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-08-09

7.  Dyslipidaemia of obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus: the case for residual risk reduction after statin treatment.

Authors:  Vasilios G Athyros; Konstantinos Tziomalos; Asterios Karagiannis; Dimitri P Mikhailidis
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2011-02-24

8.  Implementation of guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The impulsion study.

Authors:  Asterios Karagiannis; Apostolos I Hatzitolios; Vasilios G Athyros; Kalliopi Deligianni; Charalambos Charalambous; Christos Papathanakis; Georgios Theodosiou; Theodoros Drakidis; Veronika Chatzikaloudi; Chysanthi Kamilali; Sotirios Matsiras; Athanasios Matziris; Christos Savopoulos; Maria Baltatzi; Jobst Rudolf; Konstantinos Tziomalos; Dimitri P Mikhailidis
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2009-05-05

9.  Muscle microvascular dysfunction in central obesity is related to muscle insulin insensitivity but is not reversed by high-dose statin treatment.

Authors:  Geraldine F Clough; Magdalena Turzyniecka; Lara Walter; Andrew J Krentz; Sarah H Wild; Andrew J Chipperfield; John Gamble; Christopher D Byrne
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 10.  Rationale for multiple risk intervention: the need to move from theory to practice.

Authors:  Leif R Erhardt
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.