Literature DB >> 16091895

Starting or changing therapy - a prospective study exploring antiretroviral decision-making.

J S Fehr1, D Nicca, P Sendi, E Wolf, T Wagels, A Kiss, T Bregenzer, P Vernazza, H Jäger, R Spirig, M Battegay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When to start or change antiretroviral treatment against HIV infection is of major importance. Patients' readiness is considered a major factor influencing such treatment decisions, in particular because no objective, absolute time point when to start antiretroviral therapy exists. We aimed at evaluating patients' readiness to start or change antiretroviral therapy (ART). PATIENTS AND METHODS: HIV-infected patients starting or changing ART between July 2002 and February 2003, treating physicians and nurses participated in this prospective, observational multicenter study. We assessed shared decision-making including qualitative aspects, expected treatment decisions and treatment status after 3 months.
RESULTS: 75 patients were included. Of 34 patients for whom starting ART was considered, 27 (79%) indicated that they were willing to start treatment. After 3 months, 21 of 27 (78%) actually started therapy, six did not. Patients with depression were less likely to be ready for ART (p < 0.05). Of 41 patients for whom changing ART was considered, 35 (85%) indicated that they were willing to change treatment. Of the latter 35 patients, 33 (94%) finally changed ART within 3 months. Physicians and nurses were too optimistic in predicting the start or change of ART. The main reason to start or change ART was the sole recommendation of the physician (52% in those starting, 61% in those changing ART). Patients mainly judged the decision as shared and were very satisfied (71%) with the process. Qualitative findings revealed the importance of a dialectic decisionmaking, described with two categories: "dealing with oneself and others"' and "understanding and being understood."
CONCLUSION: Patients mainly shared the decision made during consultation. Although physicians have an essential role concerning ART, patients, physicians, and nurses all contribute to the decision. Qualitative findings indicate the importance for health-care providers to include patients' expertise and contributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16091895     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-005-4141-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  5 in total

1.  Reasons for not starting antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected individuals: a changing landscape.

Authors:  Jan Fehr; Dunja Nicca; Jean-Christophe Goffard; David Haerry; Michael Schlag; Vasileios Papastamopoulos; Andy Hoepelman; Athanasius Skoutelis; Ruth Diazaraque; Bruno Ledergerber
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Patient and provider characteristics associated with the decision of HIV coinfected patients to start hepatitis C treatment.

Authors:  Karen Chan Osilla; Glenn Wagner; Jeffrey Garnett; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Mallory Witt; Laveeza Bhatti; Matthew Bidwell Goetz
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.078

Review 3.  Readiness: the state of the science (or the lack thereof).

Authors:  Richard M Grimes; Deanna E Grimes
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.071

4.  Spiritual and mind-body beliefs as barriers and motivators to HIV-treatment decision-making and medication adherence? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Heidemarie Kremer; Gail Ironson; Martina Porr
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.078

5.  Psychopathology and psychosocial adjustment in patients with HIV-associated lipodystrophy.

Authors:  Anna Barata; Jorge Malouf; Mar Gutierrez; Gracia María Mateo; Maria Antònia Sambeat; Ignasi Gich; Josep Cadafalch; Juan Wulff; Pere Domingo
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.257

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.