Literature DB >> 1609172

Cluster randomization in large public health trials: the importance of antecedent data.

S W Duffy1, M C South, N E Day.   

Abstract

Large-scale public health trials are often randomized by geographic or administrative clusters, for reasons of financial or organizational exigency. In this paper, we deal with the situation where the dependent variable is a count of events, such as mortality from, or incidence of a given disease. Simulation results show that this design may decrease power by more than 50 per cent. The lost power can largely be replaced by incorporating information on the dependent variable, within clusters, before the start of the trial. The pretrial and trial data can be analysed by negative trinomial models.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1609172     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780110304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

1.  Incidence of fires and related injuries after giving out free smoke alarms: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Ian Roberts; Angie Wade; Mark Sculpher; Phil Edwards; Catherine Godward; Huiqi Pan; Suzanne Slater
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-02

Review 2.  Statistical methods for measuring outcomes.

Authors:  G Dunn
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Cluster randomised trials with different numbers of measurements at baseline and endline: Sample size and optimal allocation.

Authors:  Andrew J Copas; Richard Hooper
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 4.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.