Literature DB >> 16091550

Questionable interpretation of results of ACTIVE study on Matrix coils by Boston Scientific.

Menno Sluzewski, Willem Jan van Rooij.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2005        PMID： 16091550      PMCID： PMC7975136     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN： 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Safety, science, and sales: a request for valid clinical trials to assess new devices for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Jean Raymond; François Guilbert; Alain Weill; Daniel Roy; Philippe LeBlanc; Guylaine Gévry; Miguel Chagnon; Jean-Paul Collet
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Andrew Molyneux; Richard Kerr; Irene Stratton; Peter Sandercock; Mike Clarke; Julia Shrimpton; Rury Holman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-10-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Matrix and bioabsorbable polymeric coils accelerate healing of intracranial aneurysms: long-term experimental study.

Authors:  Yuichi Murayama; Satoshi Tateshima; Nestor R Gonzalez; Fernando Vinuela
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Additional coiling of previously coiled cerebral aneurysms: clinical and angiographic results.

Authors:  Marjan J Slob; Menno Sluzewski; Willem Jan van Rooij; Gerwin Roks; Gabriël J E Rinkel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.825
  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Reply to letter regarding interpretation of results of ACTIVE Study.

Authors:  Menno Sluzewski; Willem-Jan van Rooij
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Materials and techniques for coiling of cerebral aneurysms: how much scientific evidence do we have?

Authors:  W Kurre; J Berkefeld
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with matrix detachable coils: a single-center experience.

Authors:  D Mitra; A Herwadkar; C Soh; A Gholkar
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Assessment of Matrix coils in a canine model of a large bifurcation aneurysm.

Authors:  Joon K Song; Yasunari Niimi; Yoshikazu Yoshino; Shinya Khoyama; Alejandro Berenstein
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-11-25       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment.

Authors:  T Ries; S Siemonsen; G Thomalla; U Grzyska; H Zeumer; J Fiehler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Validity of the Meyer Scale for Assessment of Coiled Aneurysms and Aneurysm Recurrence.

Authors:  A Rouchaud; W Brinjikji; T Gunderson; J Caroff; J-C Gentric; G Lanzino; H J Cloft; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Results of 101 aneurysms treated with polyglycolic/polylactic acid microfilament nexus coils compared with historical controls treated with standard coils.

Authors:  W J van Rooij; A N de Gast; M Sluzewski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Reporting standards for endovascular repair of saccular intracranial cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  P M Meyers; H C Schumacher; R T Higashida; C P Derdeyn; G M Nesbit; D Sacks; L R Wechsler; J B Bederson; S D Lavine; P Rasmussen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.966
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.