Literature DB >> 16091422

Neurogenic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells revisited: analysis by immunostaining, time-lapse video and microarray.

Nicoletta Bertani1, Paolo Malatesta, Giorgia Volpi, Paolo Sonego, Roberto Perris.   

Abstract

The possibility of generating neural cells from human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) by simple in vitro treatments is appealing both conceptually and practically. However, whether phenotypic modulations observed after chemical manipulation of such stem cells truly represent a genuine trans-lineage differentiation remains to be established. We have re-evaluated the effects of a frequently reported biochemical approach, based on treatment with butylated hydroxyanisole and dimethylsulphoxide, to bring about such phenotypic conversion by monitoring the morphological changes induced by the treatment in real time, by analysing the expression of phenotype-specific protein markers and by assessing the modulation of transcriptome. Video time-lapse microscopy showed that conversion of mesenchymal stem cells to a neuron-like morphology could be reproduced in normal primary fibroblasts as well as mimicked by addition of drugs eliciting cytoskeletal collapse and disruption of focal adhesion contacts. Analysis of markers revealed that mesenchymal stem cells constitutively expressed multi-lineage traits, including several pertaining to the neural one. However, the applied ;neural induction' protocol neither significantly modulated the expression of such markers, nor induced de novo translation of other neural-specific proteins. Similarly, global expression profiling of over 21,000 genes demonstrated that gene transcription was poorly affected. Most strikingly, we found that the set of genes whose expression was altered by the inductive treatment did not match those sets of genes differentially expressed when comparing untreated mesenchymal stem cells and immature neural tissues. Conversely, by comparing these gene expression profiles with that obtained from comparisons between the same cells and an unrelated non-neural organ, such as liver, we found that the adopted neural induction protocol was no more effective in redirecting human mesenchymal stem cells toward a neural phenotype than toward an endodermal hepatic pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16091422     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.02511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  48 in total

1.  Comparison of long-term retinoic acid-based neural induction methods of bone marrow human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Busra Mammadov; Nihal Karakas; Sevim Isik
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 2.  From stem cells to oligodendrocytes: prospects for brain therapy.

Authors:  Cui P Chen; Mary E Kiel; Dorota Sadowski; Randall D McKinnon
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Inducible expression of chimeric EWS/ETS proteins confers Ewing's family tumor-like phenotypes to human mesenchymal progenitor cells.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Miyagawa; Hajime Okita; Hideki Nakaijima; Yasuomi Horiuchi; Ban Sato; Tomoko Taguchi; Masashi Toyoda; Yohko U Katagiri; Junichiro Fujimoto; Jun-Ichi Hata; Akihiro Umezawa; Nobutaka Kiyokawa
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  A distinct role for secreted fibroblast growth factor-binding proteins in development.

Authors:  Krissa A Gibby; Kevin McDonnell; Marcel O Schmidt; Anton Wellstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Pericyte dynamics during angiogenesis: new insights from new identities.

Authors:  Peter C Stapor; Richard S Sweat; Derek C Dashti; Aline M Betancourt; Walter Lee Murfee
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 1.934

6.  Comparative capability of menstrual blood versus bone marrow derived stem cells in neural differentiation.

Authors:  Fereshteh Azedi; Somaieh Kazemnejad; Amir Hassan Zarnani; Masoud Soleimani; Amir Shojaei; Shaghayegh Arasteh
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Bone marrow drives central nervous system regeneration after radiation injury.

Authors:  Jorg Dietrich; Ninib Baryawno; Naema Nayyar; Yannis K Valtis; Betty Yang; Ina Ly; Antoine Besnard; Nicolas Severe; Karin U Gustafsson; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Tracy T Batchelor; Amar Sahay; David T Scadden
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Therapeutic Advancement in Neuronal Transdifferentiation of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Princy Choudhary; Ayushi Gupta; Sangeeta Singh
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.444

9.  Peripheral Nerve Regeneration by Secretomes of Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth.

Authors:  Yukiko Sugimura-Wakayama; Wataru Katagiri; Masashi Osugi; Takamasa Kawai; Kenichi Ogata; Kohei Sakaguchi; Hideharu Hibi
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 10.  In vitro differentiation of embryonic and adult stem cells into hepatocytes: state of the art.

Authors:  Sarah Snykers; Joery De Kock; Vera Rogiers; Tamara Vanhaecke
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.