Literature DB >> 1608864

Treatment of ununited tibial fractures: a comparison of surgery and pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF).

H R Gossling1, R A Bernstein, J Abbott.   

Abstract

The use of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) is gaining acceptance for the treatment of ununited fractures. The results of 44 articles published in the English language literature have been compiled to assess the effectiveness of PEMF vs surgical therapy. For ununited tibial fractures, 81% of reported cases healed with PEMF vs 82% with surgery. After multiple failed surgeries, the success rate of PEMF is reported to be greater than with surgery; this discrepancy increases with additional numbers of prior surgeries. In infected nonunions, the results of surgical treatment decreased by 21% and were less than the results utilizing PEMF (69% vs 81%). In open fractures, surgical healing exceeded PEMF (89% vs 78%), whereas in closed injuries PEMF cases healed more frequently (85% vs 79%). In general, PEMF treatment of ununited fractures has proved to be more successful than noninvasive traditional management and at least as effective as surgical therapies. Given the costs and potential dangers of surgery, PEMF should be considered an effective alternative. Experience supports its role as a successful method of treatment for ununited fractures of the tibia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1608864     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19920601-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF)--results in evidence based medicine].

Authors:  Karin Pieber; Othmar Schuhfried; Veronika Fialka-Moser
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007-01

2.  Extremely low frequency electromagnetic stimulation reduces ischemic stroke volume by improving cerebral collateral blood flow.

Authors:  Hannelore Kemps; Chantal Dessy; Laurent Dumas; Pierre Sonveaux; Lotte Alders; Jana Van Broeckhoven; Lena Perez Font; Sara Lambrichts; Sébastien Foulquier; Sven Hendrix; Bert Brône; Robin Lemmens; Annelies Bronckaers
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.960

3.  Osteogenic protein-1 for long bone nonunion: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2005-04-01

4.  The effect of an intramedullary implant with a static magnetic field on the healing of the osteotomised rabbit femur.

Authors:  Nuri Aydin; Murat Bezer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in the treatment of fresh scaphoid fractures. A multicenter, prospective, double blind, placebo controlled, randomized trial.

Authors:  Pascal Hannemann; Kevin W A Göttgens; Bob J van Wely; Karel A Kolkman; Andries J Werre; Martijn Poeze; Peter R G Brink
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-07-26

7.  Systemic treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields do not affect bone microarchitecture in osteoporotic rats.

Authors:  Olav P van der Jagt; Jacqueline C van der Linden; Jan H Waarsing; Jan A N Verhaar; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  A novel single pulsed electromagnetic field stimulates osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and bone repair.

Authors:  Yin-Chih Fu; Chih-Chun Lin; Je-Ken Chang; Chung-Hwan Chen; I-Chun Tai; Gwo-Jaw Wang; Mei-Ling Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Rap system of stress stimulation can promote bone union after lower tibial bone fracture: a clinical research.

Authors:  Jian-fei Yao; Jia-zuo Shen; Da-kun Li; Da-sheng Lin; Lin Li; Qiang Li; Peng Qi; Ke-jian Lian; Zhen-qi Ding
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats.

Authors:  O P van der Jagt; J C van der Linden; J H Waarsing; J A N Verhaar; H Weinans
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.