Literature DB >> 16088423

Do Germans keep patients too long in hospital? A prospective randomized trial.

Cornelia M E Dotzenrath1, Kenko Cupisti, Andreas Raffel, Birgit Aust, Quh Yang, Björn Krüger, Christian Ohmann, Hans Dietrich Röher, Peter E Goretzki.   

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness reduces hospital stay for all patients with thyroid surgery but lacks information on medical comparability and patients' fulfilled expectations. The aim of this study was to assess if a hospital stay of 2 days after thyroid surgery had a negative influence on the medical quality or on health-related quality of life. In a controlled prospective randomized trial with 238 patients, a postoperative hospital stay of 2 days was compared to one longer than 2 days. The postoperative medical investigation included serum calcium levels, laryngeal nerve function, and suction drainage volume. Health-related quality of life was assessed on the day of admission before the operation and again 14 days after discharge. Fourteen days after discharge patients were also asked about their subjective health. Despite the study design, it was necessary, for ethical reasons, to let the patients decide when to leave the hospital. In the 2-day study group, 56.6% of the patients preferred hospitalization for more than 2 days (most choosing 3 days). Medical reasons were hyperthyroidism (p < 0.02) and postoperative hypocalcemia (p < 0.03). In the control group 28% left the hospital after 2 days. Only 35% of the patients left the hospital at the second postoperative day, but 60% of these patient supported this shorter hospitalization. Health-related quality of life and self-rated health was significantly higher in patients leaving the hospital on the second postoperative day. A 2-day hospital stay after thyroid surgery is possible and does not show medical or health-related quality of life disadvantages in patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course who consider themselves healthy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16088423     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7742-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  15 in total

1.  Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

Authors:  D Moher; A Jones; L Lepage
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  [Complications in thyroid surgery. Incidence and therapy].

Authors:  H D Röher; P E Goretzki; P Hellmann; J Witte
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Randomized prospective evaluation of frozen-section analysis for follicular neoplasms of the thyroid.

Authors:  R Udelsman; W H Westra; P I Donovan; T A Sohn; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Hypocalcaemia following thyroidectomy for thyrotoxicosis.

Authors:  A C See; K C Soo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  [Controlling in a surgical university clinic exemplified by bilateral thyroid gland resection].

Authors:  B Mann; O Skowronnek; H J Buhr
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd       Date:  1998

Review 6.  Hypocalcemia following thyroid surgery: incidence and prediction of outcome.

Authors:  F Pattou; F Combemale; S Fabre; B Carnaille; M Decoulx; J L Wemeau; A Racadot; C Proye
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The surgical treatment of Graves' disease.

Authors:  F Menegaux; T Ruprecht; J P Chigot
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993-03

8.  Surgery still has a role in Graves' hyperthyroidism.

Authors:  N A Patwardhan; M Moront; S Rao; S Rossi; L E Braverman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Changes of serum calcium level following thyroid surgery--reasons and clinical implications.

Authors:  L Kovács; M I Góth; A Vörös; E Hubina; G Szilágyi; I Szabolcs
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.949

10.  One-day vs standard thyroidectomy. A perspective study of feasibility.

Authors:  M Testini; M Nacchiero; S Miniello; G Piccinni; B Di Venere; G Lissidini; E Bussetta; G M Bonomo
Journal:  Minerva Endocrinol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.184

View more
  3 in total

1.  A critical analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy: how experience with 1,400 appendectomies allowed innovative treatment to become standard in a university hospital.

Authors:  Kerstin S Schick; Thomas P Hüttl; Jan M Fertmann; Hans-Martin Hornung; Karl-Walter Jauch; Johannes N Hoffmann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a teaching operation: comparison of outcome between residents and attending surgeons in 1,747 patients.

Authors:  René Fahrner; Matthias Turina; Valentin Neuhaus; Othmar Schöb
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Laparoscopic appendectomy as a teaching procedure: experiences with 1,197 patients in a community hospital.

Authors:  René Fahrner; Othmar Schöb
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 2.549

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.