Literature DB >> 16088198

Association between method of delivery and puerperal infectious complications in the perinatal database of Baden-Württemberg 1998-2001.

E Simoes1, S Kunz, M Bosing-Schwenkglenks, F W Schmahl.   

Abstract

The strongest argument against caesarean delivery relates to maternal complications. Evidence supporting this for elective operations is controversial. The perinatal database 1998-2001 of the German state of Baden-Württemberg was studied to assess the maternal obstetrical risk associated with caesarean delivery with regard to puerperal infectious complications. For statistical analysis the chi2 test, Fisher's exact test, Mantel-Haenszel statistics and relative risks were used to describe the risk of exposure. Surgical delivery was associated with a significantly higher risk of infectious disorders (p < 0.0001). There was a significantly higher risk of septicaemia in the group undergoing caesarean compared to vaginal delivery (p < 0.0001), for pregnancies with and without risk factors of infection, and also for caesarean delivery prior to labour and rupture of membranes (ROM) and singleton gestations (RR 8.56; 95% CI 4.4-16.65, stratum without risks). The rate of wound disorders was found to be significantly increased in the case of surgical delivery (p < 0.0001). After exclusion of pregnancies with risk factors for infectious complications and multi-fetal gestation, a significantly higher risk was also found for caesarean delivery prior to labour and ROM versus vaginal delivery (RR 16.97; 95% CI 14.16-20.34). Caesarean delivery significantly increased the likelihood that a woman would experience fever in puerperium (p < 0.0001), for pregnancies with and without ante- or perinatal risk factors for infectious complications, and also when caesarean delivery prior to labour and ROM and singletons in the cephalic presentation were considered separately (RR 11.03; 95% CI 9.39-12.96; stratum without risks). Considering the obstetrical challenge of how more women can deliver with fewer complications, reducing unnecessary caesarean delivery still seems to be an appropriate approach. Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16088198     DOI: 10.1159/000087208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  3 in total

1.  Scheduled cesarean delivery: maternal and neonatal risks in primiparous women in a community hospital setting.

Authors:  Lieschen H Quiroz; Howard Chang; Joan L Blomquist; Yvonne K Okoh; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Birth in Brazil: national survey into labour and birth.

Authors:  Maria do Carmo Leal; Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva; Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias; Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama; Daphne Rattner; Maria Elizabeth Moreira; Mariza Miranda Theme Filha; Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues; Ana Paula Esteves Pereira; Jacqueline Alves Torres; Sonia Duarte Azevedo Bittencourt; Eleonora D'orsi; Antonio Jla Cunha; Alvaro Jorge Madeiro Leite; Rejane Silva Cavalcante; Sonia Lansky; Carmem Simone Grilo Diniz; Célia Landmann Szwarcwald
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Risk factors for postpartum sepsis: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Samina Bakhtawar; Sana Sheikh; Rahat Qureshi; Zahra Hoodbhoy; Beth Payne; Iqbal Azam; Peter von Dadelszen; Laura Magee
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.