Literature DB >> 16088039

The motility of epididymal or testicular spermatozoa does not directly affect IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcomes.

Kenneth K Moghadam1, Reed Nett, Jared C Robins, Michael A Thomas, Sherif G Awadalla, Michael D Scheiber, Daniel B Williams.   

Abstract

Our objective was to determine whether the presence of motility in surgically obtained sperm samples improves fertilization and pregnancy rates for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). This was a retrospective study in a hospital-based infertility center. Sixty-seven couples with a diagnosis of azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia who had undergone a sperm retrieval procedure in conjunction with 100 IVF/ICSI cycles from 1995 to 2004 were evaluated. The impact of sperm motility on fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates was determined. The motile and nonmotile sperm groups differed in the number of mature oocytes retrieved (10.7 +/- 5.8 vs 13.4 +/- 6.0), but fertilization (56.7% vs 59.1%) and embryo cryopreservation rates (35.9% vs 39.3%) were statistically similar. Clinical pregnancy rates did not differ between the motile (38.5%) and nonmotile (31.2%) groups, nor did they differ between obstructive and nonobstructive patients (35.3% vs 26.7%). There was also no statistical difference in pregnancy rates between testicular and epididymal aspiration (35.3% vs 26.7%), although epididymal sperm were significantly more likely to be motile than testicular sperm (100% vs 39.3%, P < .0001). Epididymal aspiration is more likely to produce motile sperm than testicular sperm retrieval. The use of motile sperm from epididymal or testicular samples, however, does not appear to enhance fertilization or clinical pregnancy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16088039     DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.05018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Insights and Latest Updates in Sperm Motility and Associated Applications in Assisted Reproduction.

Authors:  Reyon Dcunha; Reda S Hussein; Hanumappa Ananda; Sandhya Kumari; Satish Kumar Adiga; Nagarajan Kannan; Yulian Zhao; Guruprasad Kalthur
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  The outcome of ART in males with impaired spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Vs Mangoli; Sp Dandekar; Sk Desai; Rv Mangoli
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2008-07

3.  The predictive value of anti-Mullerian hormone on embryo quality, blastocyst development, and pregnancy rate following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

Authors:  Wen-Qin Lin; Ling-Nv Yao; Dong-Xue Zhang; Wei Zhang; Xiao-Jing Yang; Rong Yu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Are sperm parameters able to predict the success of assisted reproductive technology? A retrospective analysis of over 22,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Villani; Daria Morini; Giorgia Spaggiari; Angela Immacolata Falbo; Beatrice Melli; Giovanni Battista La Sala; Marilina Romeo; Manuela Simoni; Lorenzo Aguzzoli; Daniele Santi
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 5.  A step-by-step guide to office-based sperm retrieval for obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Robert M Coward; Jesse N Mills
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.