BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical activity of imatinib mesylate in patients with recurrent and refractory c-kit-expressing small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with c-kit-expressing SCLC (> or =1+ by immunohistochemistry) were enrolled in two groups. Arm A included patients with disease progression <3 months and arm B included patients with disease progression > or =3 months after previous treatment. Imatinib was administered at a dose of 400 mg b.i.d. continuously, with a cycle length of 28 days. A single stage Simon design with a planned interim analysis was used to evaluate the 16-week progression free rate in each arm. RESULTS: A total of 29 evaluable patients were entered into the study (seven in arm A, median age 68; 22 in arm B, median age 64.5). Median number of treatment cycles was one in both arms. Grade 3+ non-hematologic adverse events were seen in 15 (52%) patients, with nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, fatigue, anorexia and dehydration each occurring in at least 10% of patients. Median survival was 3.9 and 5.3 months and median time to progression was 1 and 1.1 months for arms A and B, respectively. Enrollment to arm A was temporarily suspended prior to reaching interim analysis due to striking early disease progression (29%), early deaths (29%) and patient refusal (42%). No objective responses and no confirmed stable disease > or =6 weeks were seen in either arm. Accrual was permanently terminated to both arms as only one patient was progression-free at 16 weeks. CONCLUSION: Imatinib failed to demonstrate any clinical activity in spite of patient selection for c-kit-expressing SCLC. Our results strengthen the collective evidence that prediction of efficacy of novel therapeutic agents based on target expression, rather than pathway activation (for example, through activating mutations), may not be a valid paradigm for drug development.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical activity of imatinib mesylate in patients with recurrent and refractory c-kit-expressing small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with c-kit-expressing SCLC (> or =1+ by immunohistochemistry) were enrolled in two groups. Arm A included patients with disease progression <3 months and arm B included patients with disease progression > or =3 months after previous treatment. Imatinib was administered at a dose of 400 mg b.i.d. continuously, with a cycle length of 28 days. A single stage Simon design with a planned interim analysis was used to evaluate the 16-week progression free rate in each arm. RESULTS: A total of 29 evaluable patients were entered into the study (seven in arm A, median age 68; 22 in arm B, median age 64.5). Median number of treatment cycles was one in both arms. Grade 3+ non-hematologic adverse events were seen in 15 (52%) patients, with nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, fatigue, anorexia and dehydration each occurring in at least 10% of patients. Median survival was 3.9 and 5.3 months and median time to progression was 1 and 1.1 months for arms A and B, respectively. Enrollment to arm A was temporarily suspended prior to reaching interim analysis due to striking early disease progression (29%), early deaths (29%) and patient refusal (42%). No objective responses and no confirmed stable disease > or =6 weeks were seen in either arm. Accrual was permanently terminated to both arms as only one patient was progression-free at 16 weeks. CONCLUSION:Imatinib failed to demonstrate any clinical activity in spite of patient selection for c-kit-expressing SCLC. Our results strengthen the collective evidence that prediction of efficacy of novel therapeutic agents based on target expression, rather than pathway activation (for example, through activating mutations), may not be a valid paradigm for drug development.
Authors: Alan P Venook; Maria E Arcila; Al B Benson; Donald A Berry; David Ross Camidge; Robert W Carlson; Toni K Choueiri; Valerie Guild; Gregory P Kalemkerian; Razelle Kurzrock; Christine M Lovly; Amy E McKee; Robert J Morgan; Anthony J Olszanski; Mary W Redman; Vered Stearns; Joan McClure; Marian L Birkeland Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Michael Medinger; Manuela Kleinschmidt; Klaus Mross; Barbara Wehmeyer; Clemens Unger; Hans-Eckart Schaefer; Renate Weber; Marc Azemar Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Julian R Molina; Nathan R Foster; Thanyanan Reungwetwattana; Garth D Nelson; Andrew V Grainger; Preston D Steen; Philip J Stella; Randolph Marks; John Wright; Alex A Adjei Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Antonius A Miller; Herbert Pang; Lydia Hodgson; Nithya Ramnath; Gregory A Otterson; Michael J Kelley; Robert A Kratzke; Everett E Vokes Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 15.609