Elsy Söderberg1, Kristina Alexanderson. 1. Division of Social Medicine and Public Health Science, Department of Health and Society, Linköping University, S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden. elsy.soderberg.holberg@fk05.sfa.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The sickness certificate is a major instrument for establishing contact and conveying information between two authorities that have a substantial impact on the life situation and work situation of the patients, as well as on the economic costs of the society. AIM: A study was undertaken to assess the quality of physicians' sickness certificates as a basis for social insurance officers' decisions regarding entitlement to sickness benefits. METHOD: Information on all 2,449 sickness certificates for sick-leave periods exceeding 28 days' sick leave period received at the social insurance offices in one Swedish county during one week in 2002 was coded and analysed. RESULTS: Information provided in the certificates was often not sufficient to allow social insurance officers to determine eligibility for sickness benefits. Qualitative analyses of certificates from general practitioners (GPs) revealed that 21% contained ambiguous statements about the medical disorder, 30% were unclear regarding the assessment of functional capacity, and 22% required additional information on both those aspects. Sickness certificates issued by GPs and physicians under specialist training, as compared with other categories of physicians, more often provided essential data, for example concerning the patient's occupational tasks and type of employment. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians often fail to contribute required information concerning functional capacity and other important aspects when issuing sickness certificates. This limits the use of these documents as a basis for decisions regarding sickness insurance benefits. The practical consequences of incomplete certificates might be delayed payment of benefits and delayed initiation of return to work measures.
BACKGROUND: The sickness certificate is a major instrument for establishing contact and conveying information between two authorities that have a substantial impact on the life situation and work situation of the patients, as well as on the economic costs of the society. AIM: A study was undertaken to assess the quality of physicians' sickness certificates as a basis for social insurance officers' decisions regarding entitlement to sickness benefits. METHOD: Information on all 2,449 sickness certificates for sick-leave periods exceeding 28 days' sick leave period received at the social insurance offices in one Swedish county during one week in 2002 was coded and analysed. RESULTS: Information provided in the certificates was often not sufficient to allow social insurance officers to determine eligibility for sickness benefits. Qualitative analyses of certificates from general practitioners (GPs) revealed that 21% contained ambiguous statements about the medical disorder, 30% were unclear regarding the assessment of functional capacity, and 22% required additional information on both those aspects. Sickness certificates issued by GPs and physicians under specialist training, as compared with other categories of physicians, more often provided essential data, for example concerning the patient's occupational tasks and type of employment. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians often fail to contribute required information concerning functional capacity and other important aspects when issuing sickness certificates. This limits the use of these documents as a basis for decisions regarding sickness insurance benefits. The practical consequences of incomplete certificates might be delayed payment of benefits and delayed initiation of return to work measures.
Authors: Anna Löfgren; Jan Hagberg; Britt Arrelöv; Sari Ponzer; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Christina Lindholm; Britt Arrelöv; Gunnar Nilsson; Anna Löfgren; Elin Hinas; Ylva Skånér; Anna Ekmer; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Gunnar H Nilsson; Britt Arrelöv; Christina Lindholm; Therese Ljungquist; Linnea Kjeldgård; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Richard Bränström; Britt Arrelöv; Catharina Gustavsson; Linnea Kjeldgård; Therese Ljungquist; Gunnar H Nilsson; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 3.295