Literature DB >> 16086921

A randomized trial comparing clopidogrel versus ticlopidine therapy in patients undergoing infarct artery stenting for acute myocardial infarction with abciximab as adjunctive therapy.

Guido Parodi1, Roberto Sciagrà, Angela Migliorini, Gentian Memisha, Guia Moschi, Renato Valenti, Alberto Pupi, David Antoniucci.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the impact of a clopidogrel therapy on the effectiveness of myocardial reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing routine infarct-related artery (IRA) stent implantation and receiving routine abciximab therapy.
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory processes after mechanical restoration of flow in AMI play a central role in decreasing the effectiveness of reperfusion at microcirculatory level. Several studies suggest that clopidogrel may exert a protective effect against adverse cardiovascular events by virtue of its anti-inflammatory properties.
METHODS: A total of 133 patients with a first ST-elevation AMI were randomized to clopidogrel (600-mg loading dose before IRA stenting followed by 75 mg daily, n = 66) or ticlopidine (500 mg before IRA stenting followed by 250 mg twice daily, n = 67). The primary end point was scintigraphic infarct size at 1 month. The secondary end points were ST-segment elevation resolution within 3 hours of procedure and 1-month clinical outcome, as a composite of death, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke within 1 month of the index procedure.
RESULTS: The 1-month technetium 99m sestamibi scintigraphy revealed similar infarct size (16.2% +/- 14.6% vs 15.0% +/- 14.1%, P = .703) and severity (0.48 +/- 0.18 vs 0.49 +/- 0.15, P = .592) in the clopidogrel group as compared with the ticlopidine group. Three-hour ST-segment resolution rate was similar in the 2 study groups (86% vs 89%, P = .642). At 1 month, there was no difference in major cardiovascular adverse event rate (3% vs 3%, P = .988). Discontinuation of thienopiridine therapy within the first month occurred in no patient randomized to clopidogrel and in 3 (4.5%) patients randomized to ticlopidine (P = .082).
CONCLUSION: Clopidogrel has no impact on the effectiveness of myocardial reperfusion in patients with AMI treated routinely with stenting and abciximab. However, clopidogrel, administered as a 600-mg loading dose followed by 75 mg daily, is safe and at least as effective as the standard ticlopidine therapy in this subgroup of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16086921     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  4 in total

1.  Clopidogrel compared with other antiplatelet agents for secondary prevention of vascular events in adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: clinical and cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  Sy Chen; E Russell; S Banerjee; B Hutton; A Brown; K Asakawa; L McGahan; M Clark; M Severn; J Cox; M Sharma
Journal:  CADTH Technol Overv       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 2.  Clopidogrel: a review of its use in the prevention of thrombosis.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Antithrombotic therapies in primary angioplasty: rationale, results and future directions.

Authors:  Giuseppe De Luca; Paolo Marino
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Type 1 Myocardial Infarction With a Focus on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

Authors:  Christopher Reid; Ahmed Alturki; Andrew Yan; Derek So; Dennis Ko; Jean-Francois Tanguay; Amal Bessissow; Shamir Mehta; Shaun Goodman; Thao Huynh
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-02-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.