Literature DB >> 16086166

Partitioning mechanisms of predator interference in different habitats.

Blaine D Griffen1, James E Byers.   

Abstract

Prey are often consumed by multiple predator species. Predation rates on shared prey species measured in isolation often do not combine additively due to interference or facilitation among the predator species. Furthermore, the strength of predator interactions and resulting prey mortality may change with habitat type. We experimentally examined predation on amphipods in rock and algal habitats by two species of intertidal crabs, Hemigrapsus sanguineus (top predators) and Carcinus maenas (intermediate predators). Algae provided a safer habitat for amphipods when they were exposed to only a single predator species. When both predator species were present, mortality of amphipods was less than additive in both habitats. However, amphipod mortality was reduced more in rock than algal habitat because intermediate predators were less protected in rock habitat and were increasingly targeted by omnivorous top predators. We found that prey mortality in general was reduced by (1) altered foraging behavior of intermediate predators in the presence of top predators, (2) top predators switching to foraging on intermediate predators rather than shared prey, and (3) density reduction of intermediate predators. The relative importance of these three mechanisms was the same in both habitats; however, the magnitude of each was greater in rock habitat. Our study demonstrates that the strength of specific mechanisms of interference between top and intermediate predators can be quantified but cautions that these results may be habitat specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16086166     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0211-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Intraguild interference and biocontrol effects of generalist predators in a winter wheat field.

Authors:  Andreas Lang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species.

Authors:  Danielle M Warfe; Leon A Barmuta
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Multiple predator effects result in risk reduction for prey across multiple prey densities.

Authors:  Heather D Vance-Chalcraft; Daniel A Soluk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey.

Authors:  A Sih; G Englund; D Wooster
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Host plant manipulation of natural enemies: leaf domatia protect beneficial mites from insect predators.

Authors:  Andrew P Norton; Greg English-Loeb; Edward Belden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Measuring responses to simulated predation threat using behavioral and physiological metrics: the role of aquatic vegetation.

Authors:  Christa M Woodley; Mark S Peterson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Trichomes and spider-mite webbing protect predatory mite eggs from intraguild predation.

Authors:  A Roda; J Nyrop; M Dicke; G English-Loeb
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Physical habitat attribute mediates biotic resistance to non-indigenous species invasion.

Authors:  James E Byers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total
  17 in total

1.  Detecting emergent effects of multiple predator species.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Spatial refuge from intraguild predation: implications for prey suppression and trophic cascades.

Authors:  Deborah L Finke; Robert F Denno
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Emergent impacts of cannibalism and size refuges in prey on intraguild predation systems.

Authors:  Volker H W Rudolf; Joanna Armstrong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Intraguild Predation in Heteroptera: Effects of Density and Predator Identity on Dipteran Prey.

Authors:  S Brahma; D Sharma; M Kundu; N Saha; G K Saha; G Aditya
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 1.434

5.  Shoaling behaviour enhances risk of predation from multiple predator guilds in a marine fish.

Authors:  John R Ford; Stephen E Swearer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Contrasting complexity of adjacent habitats influences the strength of cascading predatory effects.

Authors:  James E Byers; Zachary C Holmes; Jennafer C Malek
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Predator biomass determines the magnitude of non-consumptive effects (NCEs) in both laboratory and field environments.

Authors:  Jennifer M Hill; Marc J Weissburg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Intraguild interactions between Euseius stipulatus and the candidate biocontrol agents of Tetranychus urticae in Spanish clementine orchards: Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus.

Authors:  Raquel Abad-Moyano; Alberto Urbaneja; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.132

9.  A positive trait-mediated indirect effect involving the natural enemies of competing herbivores.

Authors:  F J Frank van Veen; Callum E Brandon; H Charles J Godfray
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Influence of predator density on nonindependent effects of multiple predator species.

Authors:  Blaine D Griffen; Tucker Williamson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.