AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Preferential visceral adipose tissue (VAT) accumulation has been clearly associated with insulin resistance. In contrast, the impact of visceral obesity on beta cell function is controversial. METHODS: In 62 non-diabetic women and men (age 24-69 years, BMI 21-39 kg/m2), we measured VAT and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) fat mass by magnetic resonance imaging. We also measured insulin secretion and beta cell function by C-peptide deconvolution and physiological modelling of data from a frequently sampled, 75-g, 3-h OGTT, respectively. RESULTS: VAT (range 0.1-3.1 kg) was strongly related to sex, age and BMI; SAT was related to sex and BMI. Controlling for sex, age, BMI and SAT by multivariate analysis, excess VAT was associated with a clinical phenotype comprising higher plasma glucose levels, BP, heart rate and serum transaminases. The corresponding metabolic phenotype consisted of insulin resistance (partial r=-0.38) and hyperinsulinaemia (partial r=0.29). The latter, however, was appropriate for the degree of insulin resistance regardless of obesity and abdominal fat distribution. Moreover, none of the model-derived parameters describing beta cell function (glucose sensitivity, rate sensitivity and potentiation) was independently associated with excess VAT. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: In non-diabetic Caucasian adults of either sex, preferential visceral fat deposition in itself is part of an insulin-resistant phenotype. The insulin secretory response to a physiological challenge is increased to fully compensate for the insulin resistance, but the dynamics of beta cell function (glucose sensitivity, rate sensitivity and potentiation) are largely preserved.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Preferential visceral adipose tissue (VAT) accumulation has been clearly associated with insulin resistance. In contrast, the impact of visceral obesity on beta cell function is controversial. METHODS: In 62 non-diabeticwomen and men (age 24-69 years, BMI 21-39 kg/m2), we measured VAT and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) fat mass by magnetic resonance imaging. We also measured insulin secretion and beta cell function by C-peptide deconvolution and physiological modelling of data from a frequently sampled, 75-g, 3-h OGTT, respectively. RESULTS: VAT (range 0.1-3.1 kg) was strongly related to sex, age and BMI; SAT was related to sex and BMI. Controlling for sex, age, BMI and SAT by multivariate analysis, excess VAT was associated with a clinical phenotype comprising higher plasma glucose levels, BP, heart rate and serum transaminases. The corresponding metabolic phenotype consisted of insulin resistance (partial r=-0.38) and hyperinsulinaemia (partial r=0.29). The latter, however, was appropriate for the degree of insulin resistance regardless of obesity and abdominal fat distribution. Moreover, none of the model-derived parameters describing beta cell function (glucose sensitivity, rate sensitivity and potentiation) was independently associated with excess VAT. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: In non-diabetic Caucasian adults of either sex, preferential visceral fat deposition in itself is part of an insulin-resistant phenotype. The insulin secretory response to a physiological challenge is increased to fully compensate for the insulin resistance, but the dynamics of beta cell function (glucose sensitivity, rate sensitivity and potentiation) are largely preserved.
Authors: M M Gabir; R L Hanson; D Dabelea; G Imperatore; J Roumain; P H Bennett; W C Knowler Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Lynne E Wagenknecht; Carl D Langefeld; Ann L Scherzinger; Jill M Norris; Steven M Haffner; Mohammed F Saad; Richard N Bergman Journal: Diabetes Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: S Bonekamp; P Ghosh; S Crawford; S F Solga; A Horska; F L Brancati; A M Diehl; S Smith; J M Clark Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2007-08-14 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: A S Cheung; C de Rooy; R Hoermann; E J Gianatti; E J Hamilton; G Roff; J D Zajac; M Grossmann Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Nana Gletsu-Miller; Henry S Kahn; Danijela Gasevic; Zhe Liang; Jennifer K Frediani; William E Torres; Thomas R Ziegler; Lawrence S Phillips; Edward Lin Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Cynthia K Sites; Brian C Cooper; Michael J Toth; Amalia Gastaldelli; Ali Arabshahi; Stephen Barnes Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2007-04-06 Impact factor: 7.329