Literature DB >> 16085930

Use of specific indicators to detect warfarin-related adverse events.

Charles E Hartis1, Michael O Gum, James W Lederer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of specific indicators, or "triggers," to identify adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with warfarin therapy is described.
SUMMARY: Automated triggers provided by laboratory and pharmacy data were used to identify potential ADEs associated with warfarin therapy among patients treated in the emergency room or admitted to six community hospitals between July 2002 and December 2003. The triggers consisted of an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of greater than 3.0 and pharmacy orders for vitamin K. Pharmacists reviewed the triggers monthly for clinical determination of ADEs during preintervention and postintervention periods. Interventions consisted of staff education and real-time adjustments in therapy. A 39% overall reduction in ADEs occurred between the preintervention and postintervention periods. Harmful ADEs declined by 70%.
CONCLUSION: INRs of greater than 3.0 and vitamin K administration appeared to be reliable indicators of warfarin-associated ADEs, and detection with these indicators appeared to reduce ADEs when combined with appropriate interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16085930     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp040404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the performance characteristics of clinical event monitor signals used to detect adverse drug events in the hospital setting.

Authors:  Steven M Handler; Richard L Altman; Subashan Perera; Joseph T Hanlon; Stephanie A Studenski; James E Bost; Melissa I Saul; Douglas B Fridsma
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  A survey of nursing home physicians to determine laboratory monitoring adverse drug event alert preferences.

Authors:  R D Boyce; S Perera; D A Nace; C M Culley; S M Handler
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Computerized detection of adverse drug reactions in the medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sandra L Kane-Gill; Shyam Visweswaran; Melissa I Saul; An-Kwok Ian Wong; Louis E Penrod; Steven M Handler
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 4.  A systematic review to evaluate the accuracy of electronic adverse drug event detection.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Alison Jennings; Claire Chow; Ciera Leeder; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Detection of adverse drug reactions by medication antidote signals and comparison of their sensitivity with common methods of ADR detection.

Authors:  Lateef M Khan; Sameer E Al-Harthi; Huda M Alkreathy; Abdel-Moneim M Osman; Ahmed S Ali
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Improving inpatient warfarin therapy safety using a pharmacist-managed protocol.

Authors:  Paul R Daniels; Dennis M Manning; James P Moriarty; Juliane Bingener-Casey; Narith N Ou; John G O'Meara; Daniel L Roellinger; James M Naessens
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2018-04-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.