Literature DB >> 16085295

Prevention of adhesion formation after radical oophorectomy using a sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose (HA-CMC) barrier.

Robert E Bristow1, F J Montz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose (HA-CMC) barrier for prevention of pelvic adhesion formation in women undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery with radical oophorectomy for locally advanced epithelial cancer.
METHODS: Between 3/1/01 and 3/1/02, all patients undergoing primary surgery for locally advanced FIGO Stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer were prospectively offered study enrollment. Radical oophorectomy (en bloc rectosigmoid colectomy) with total pelvic peritonectomy was performed as clinically indicated. Intestinal continuity was reestablished via stapled anastomosis following complete cytoreduction of pelvic disease. The entire pelvic peritoneal defect was covered with subdivided sheets of HA-CMC (6.5 cm x 5.0 cm) using a 'quilting' technique. The abdominal wall incision site was not treated with adhesion preventive measures. At second-look surgery, four-quadrant pelvic (treated area) and abdominal wall (untreated internal control) adhesion scores were assigned using a previously validated scoring system. Statistical analysis for differences in mean pelvic and abdominal wall adhesion scores was performed using Student's t test.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients satisfied all inclusion criteria. Abdominal wall adhesions were noted in 92.9% of patients. In the pelvis, the dorsal peritoneal surfaces were the most common sites of adhesion formation (42.9%). Overall, the mean pelvic (treated) adhesion score was statistically significantly lower (0.91, SD +/- 1.04) than the mean abdominal wall (untreated control) score (5.56, SD +/- 4.55, P = 0.02). There were no instances of intestinal anastomotic leak, and no peri-operative complications directly attributable to HA-CMC were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Placement of a HA-CMC barrier is associated with a significant reduction in the extent and density of pelvic adhesion formation following radical oophorectomy and pelvic peritonectomy for locally advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16085295     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  9 in total

1.  Preventing adhesions in obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures.

Authors:  Víctor Hugo González-Quintero; Francisco E Cruz-Pachano
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

Review 2.  A review of the problematic adhesion prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery.

Authors:  Anja Hirschelmann; Garri Tchartchian; Markus Wallwiener; Andreas Hackethal; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Inhibition of adhesion, proliferation, and invasion of primary endometriosis and endometrial stromal and ovarian carcinoma cells by a nonhyaluronan adhesion barrier gel.

Authors:  Stefan P Renner; Pamela L Strissel; Matthias W Beckmann; Johannes Lermann; Stefanie Burghaus; Janina Hackl; Peter A Fasching; Reiner Strick
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Recent Advances of Biomedical Materials for Prevention of Post-ESD Esophageal Stricture.

Authors:  Yuchen Bao; Zhenguang Li; Yingze Li; Tao Chen; Yu Cheng; Meidong Xu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-22

5.  Patients at risk for peritoneal surface malignancy of colorectal cancer origin: the role of second look laparotomy.

Authors:  Bldm Brücher; A Stojadinovic; A Bilchik; M Protic; M Daumer; A Nissan; A Itzhak
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Seprafilm(®) adhesion barrier: (2) a review of the clinical literature on intraabdominal use.

Authors:  Michael P Diamond; Ellen L Burns; Beverly Accomando; Sadiqa Mian; Lena Holmdahl
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2012-04-15

7.  Antiadhesive effect and safety of sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethyl cellulose membrane in thyroid surgery.

Authors:  Dong Sik Bae; Jung-Woo Woo; Se Hyun Paek; Hyungju Kwon; Young Jun Chai; Su-Jin Kim; June Young Choi; Kyu Eun Lee; Yeo-Kyu Youn
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2013-10-25

8.  Evaluation of the effects of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethyl cellulose barrier on ovarian tumor progression.

Authors:  Laetitia Picaud; Benoît Thibault; Eliane Mery; Monia Ouali; Alejandra Martinez; Jean-Pierre Delord; Bettina Couderc; Gwenael Ferron
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.234

9.  Hyaluronic acid and oxidized regenerated cellulose prevent adhesion reformation after adhesiolysis in rat models.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Qin Liu; Ning Yang; Xuegang Zhang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.162

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.