BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most health-related quality-of-life questionnaires include multi-item scales. Scale scores are usually estimated as simple sums of the item scores. However, scoring procedures utilizing more information from the items might improve measurement abilities, and thereby reduce the needed sample sizes. We investigated whether item response theory (IRT)-based scoring improved the measurement abilities of the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning, emotional functioning, and fatigue scales. METHODS: Using a database of 13,010 subjects we estimated the relative validities of IRT scoring compared to sum scoring of the scales. RESULTS: The mean relative validities were 1.04 (physical), 1.03 (emotional), and 0.97 (fatigue). None of these were significantly larger than 1. Thus, no gain in measurement abilities using IRT scoring was found for these scales. Possible explanations include that the items in the scales are not constructed for IRT scoring and that the scales are relatively short. CONCLUSION: IRT scoring of the three longest EORTC QLQ-C30 scales did not improve measurement abilities compared to the traditional sum scoring of the scales.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most health-related quality-of-life questionnaires include multi-item scales. Scale scores are usually estimated as simple sums of the item scores. However, scoring procedures utilizing more information from the items might improve measurement abilities, and thereby reduce the needed sample sizes. We investigated whether item response theory (IRT)-based scoring improved the measurement abilities of the EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning, emotional functioning, and fatigue scales. METHODS: Using a database of 13,010 subjects we estimated the relative validities of IRT scoring compared to sum scoring of the scales. RESULTS: The mean relative validities were 1.04 (physical), 1.03 (emotional), and 0.97 (fatigue). None of these were significantly larger than 1. Thus, no gain in measurement abilities using IRT scoring was found for these scales. Possible explanations include that the items in the scales are not constructed for IRT scoring and that the scales are relatively short. CONCLUSION: IRT scoring of the three longest EORTC QLQ-C30 scales did not improve measurement abilities compared to the traditional sum scoring of the scales.
Authors: N W Scott; P M Fayers; A Bottomley; N K Aaronson; A de Graeff; M Groenvold; M Koller; M A Petersen; M A G Sprangers Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Milena D Anatchkova; Constance M Barysauskas; Rebecca L Kinney; Catarina I Kiefe; Arlene S Ash; Lisa Lombardini; Jeroan J Allison Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Eva-Maria Gamper; Morten Aa Petersen; Neil Aaronson; Anna Costantini; Johannes M Giesinger; Bernhard Holzner; Georg Kemmler; Anne Oberguggenberger; Susanne Singer; Teresa Young; Mogens Groenvold Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Anju Devianee Keetharuth; Jakob Bue Bjorner; Michael Barkham; John Browne; Tim Croudace; John Brazier Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 4.147