Literature DB >> 16085075

Bone-implant interface shear modulus and ultimate stress in a transcortical rabbit model of open-pore Ti6Al4V implants.

M Müller1, F F Hennig, T Hothorn, R Stangl.   

Abstract

This experimental study on laser-textured implants aimed to evaluate periimplant bone elasticity and ultimate stress of the bone-implant interface in a rabbit femur model. After randomization, two cylindrical Ti6Al4V samples (3.5 mm wide, 5.5 mm long) were transcortically implanted in each femur of 15 female New Zealand White Rabbits. Polished implants had been laser-textured with 100, 200, and 300 microm diameter pores, and another corundum blasted implant was additionally textured with 200 microm pores. Twelve weeks into the experiment, a modified push-out test was performed. The median shear modulus indicating the elasticity of the periimplant bone was 41.12 MPa for the proximal implant location and 25.38 MPa for the distal, without evidence for significant differences between implant types. Taking into account the median ultimate shear stress for 200 microm implants with and without corundum blasting, no significant difference could be demonstrated. However, for blasted 200 microm implants a statistically significant (p<0.025) relative gain in ultimate shear stress of 41% and 17% was proven in comparison with 100 and 300 microm implants, respectively. Non-blasted 200 microm implants reached 48% relative gain in respect of 100 microm samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16085075     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Laser induced surface structuring and ion conversion in the surface oxide of titanium: possible implications for the wetability of laser treated implants.

Authors:  Johan Forsgren; María Dolores Paz; Betty León; Håkan Engqvist
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Hydroxyapatite reinforced Ti6Al4V composites for load-bearing implants.

Authors:  Jose D Avila; Kevin Stenberg; Susmita Bose; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 4.  Biomimetics of Bone Implants: The Regenerative Road.

Authors:  Elizabeth Brett; John Flacco; Charles Blackshear; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2017-01-01

5.  Bone Regeneration in Critical-Sized Bone Defects Treated with Additively Manufactured Porous Metallic Biomaterials: The Effects of Inelastic Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Marianne Koolen; Saber Amin Yavari; Karel Lietaert; Ruben Wauthle; Amir A Zadpoor; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Degradation and Biocompatibility of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Implants In Vitro and In Vivo: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study in Rats.

Authors:  Naohiko Kawamura; Yuya Nakao; Rina Ishikawa; Dai Tsuchida; Masahiro Iijima
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.