Literature DB >> 16084944

The effect of tissue fixation and processing on breast cancer size.

Bobbi Pritt1, Joseph J Tessitore, Donald L Weaver, Hagen Blaszyk.   

Abstract

Precise measurement of an invasive breast cancer is crucial for pathological staging and subsequent patient management. Formalin fixation and histological processing may change tissue size, but there is no agreement on which state of the specimen, fresh or fixed, should be used for final tumor measurement. To determine the influence of fixation and processing on breast tumor size, a specific 1-dimensional measurement from 50 invasive breast tumors was recorded in fresh, fixed, and processed/mounted states. Tumors varied in maximum measured dimension from 4 to 20 mm and contained 10% to 90% estimated fibrous tissue (mean, 52.8%). In 96% of cases, there was no difference in measured size between fresh and fixed states. After final processing and mounting, a decrease in size from initial fresh measurement was noted in 40% of cases (mean difference, 2.4 mm; maximum difference, 7 mm). In 9 cases (18%), the measured size increased by a maximum of 3 mm (mean, 1.7 mm) after processing/mounting. Twenty-one cases (42%) showed no change in measurement during the entire fixation and processing protocol. Increases in measured size were attributed largely to tissue expansion during histological sectioning/mounting. One can arguably measure the size of an invasive breast cancer from either the fresh or fixed state without affecting accuracy, but caution should be exercised in relying solely on the microscopic measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16084944     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of discrepancies in weights of fresh and fixed specimens in breast surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dinesh Thekkinkattil
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

2.  Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens.

Authors:  Bita Behjatnia; Julie Sim; Lawrence W Bassett; Neda A Moatamed; Sophia K Apple
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2010-02-22

Review 3.  Microscopic intramural extension of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A meta-analysis based on individual patient data.

Authors:  An-Sofie Verrijssen; José Guillem; Rodrigo Perez; Krzysztof Bujko; Nathalie Guedj; Angelita Habr-Gama; Ruud Houben; Danny Goudkade; Jarno Melenhorst; Jeroen Buijsen; Ben Vanneste; Heike I Grabsch; Murillo Bellezzo; Gabriel Paiva Fonseca; Frank Verhaegen; Maaike Berbee; Evert J Van Limbergen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Outcomes by tumor subtype and treatment pattern in women with small, node-negative breast cancer: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Ines Vaz-Luis; Rebecca A Ottesen; Melissa E Hughes; Rizvan Mamet; Harold J Burstein; Stephen B Edge; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Beverly Moy; Hope S Rugo; Richard L Theriault; Jane C Weeks; Eric P Winer; Nancy U Lin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Cryotherapy for breast cancer: a feasibility study without excision.

Authors:  Peter J Littrup; Bassel Jallad; Priti Chandiwala-Mody; Monica D'Agostini; Barbara A Adam; David Bouwman
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Reliability and Agreement of Radiological and Pathological Tumor Size in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1-Related Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results from a Population-Based Cohort.

Authors:  Dirk-Jan van Beek; Helena M Verkooijen; Sjoerd Nell; Bert A Bonsing; Casper H van Eijck; Harry van Goor; Frederik J H Hoogwater; Elisabeth J M Nieveen van Dijkum; Geert Kazemier; Cornelis H C Dejong; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Frank J Wessels; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Gerlof D Valk; Menno R Vriens
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.914

7.  The value of chest CT for prediction of breast tumor size: comparison with pathology measurement.

Authors:  Su Joa Ahn; Young Saing Kim; Eun Young Kim; Heung Kyu Park; Eun Kyung Cho; Yoon Kyung Kim; Yon Mi Sung; Hye-Young Choi
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Parametric imaging of the local attenuation coefficient in human axillary lymph nodes assessed using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Loretta Scolaro; Robert A McLaughlin; Blake R Klyen; Benjamin A Wood; Peter D Robbins; Christobel M Saunders; Steven L Jacques; David D Sampson
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Improved preservation of ovarian tissue morphology that is compatible with antigen detection using a fixative mixture of formalin and acetic acid.

Authors:  B V Adeniran; B D Bjarkadottir; R Appeltant; S Lane; S A Williams
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Measurement by multidetector CT scan of the volume of hypopharyngeal and laryngeal tumours: accuracy and reproducibility.

Authors:  Lorenzo Preda; Elena Lovati; Fausto Chiesa; Mohssen Ansarin; Laura Cattaneo; Roberta Fasani; Sara Gandini; Nicola Flor; Gianpaolo Cornalba; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 7.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.