Literature DB >> 16084941

Neuroendocrine differentiation in extrahepatic bile duct carcinomas and its prognostic significance.

Seung-Mo Hong1, Mi-Jung Kim, David Y Pi, Daniel Jo, Eunsil Yu, Jae Y Ro.   

Abstract

Neuroendocrine differentiation is known to be one of the prognostic factors in many carcinomas. However, the characteristics of neuroendocrine differentiation are not well elucidated in extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) carcinomas. One hundred ninety-four cases of EBD carcinomas were analyzed using immunohistochemistry with synaptophysin and chromogranin. The tumors were graded as degree 0, 1, and 2 when the positive tumor cells were 5% or less, 6% to 25%, and 26% or more, respectively. Immunohistochemical results were compared with clinicopathologic variables and survival rate. Synaptophysin and chromogranin were positive in 54 (27.8%) and 74 (38.1%) cases, respectively. Thirty-four cases (17.5%) were positive for both synaptophysin and chromogranin, 20 (10.3%) and 40 cases (20.6%) were positive only for synaptophysin and for chromogranin, respectively, and 100 cases (51.6%) were negative for both markers. There was a significant survival difference between overall synaptophysin-positive (median, 27 months) and synaptophysin-negative (38 months) groups (P < .05). However, there was no survival difference between chromogranin-positive and chromogranin-negative groups. There was a significant survival difference between the dual-positive expression to synaptophysin and chromogranin group (median, 21 months) and the dual-negative expression group (median, 35 months; P < .05). In summary, synaptophysin expression was an important prognostic factor because synaptophysin-positive cases showed a worse prognosis than synaptophysin-negative cases. The more tumor cells expressed chromogranin, the poorer the survival. Therefore, immunohistochemical studies for neuroendocrine differentiation may be helpful in routine pathological examinations for evaluating the survival and the prognosis of patients with EBD carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16084941     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  7 in total

1.  Clonality analysis of neuroendocrine cells in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Wang; Gen-You Yao; Zhong-Sheng Zhao; Xiao-Li Wei; Ru-Jun Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  The grey zone between pure (neuro)endocrine and non-(neuro)endocrine tumours: a comment on concepts and classification of mixed exocrine-endocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Marco Volante; Guido Rindi; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Markers of bile duct tumors.

Authors:  Giulia Malaguarnera; Maria Giordano; Isabella Paladina; Alessandra Rando; Mario Uccello; Francesco Basile; Antonio Biondi; Santo Carnazzo; Innocenza Alessandria; Clorinda Mazzarino
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-04-15

4.  Prognostic importance of neuroendocrine differentiation in Japanese breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Masataka Sawaki; Kazuki Yokoi; Tetsuro Nagasaka; Reiko Watanabe; Chikara Kagawa; Hideki Takada; Shigenori Sato; Tomohiro Yamada; Toyone Kikumori; Tsuneo Imai; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Goblet cell carcinoids and other mixed neuroendocrine/nonneuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Marco Volante; Luisella Righi; Sofia Asioli; Gianni Bussolati; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 6.  [Research advance on non-small cell lung carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation].

Authors:  Yun Dai; Baohui Han
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2011-02

7.  Biliary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Development and Validation of a Nomogram.

Authors:  Shengnan Zhou; Shitao Jiang; Weijie Chen; Haixin Yin; Liangbo Dong; Hao Zhao; Shaoqi Han; Xiaodong He
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.