Literature DB >> 16084576

The accuracy of examination under anesthesia and transvaginal sonography in evaluating ovarian size.

Fred R Ueland1, Paul D Depriest, Christopher P Desimone, Edward J Pavlik, Subodh M Lele, Richard J Kryscio, J R van Nagell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare pelvic examination under anesthesia to transvaginal sonography (TVS) as a method for ovarian detection and measurement.
METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-nine ovaries from 151 women were evaluated. After induction of anesthesia, a complete pelvic examination and TVS were performed, and the ovaries were removed surgically. Ovarian dimensions generated sonographically and estimated on clinical examination were compared to those obtained from the measured surgical specimen.
RESULTS: Forty-four percent of ovaries were palpable clinically whereas 85% were visualized sonographically (P < 0.001). Right ovaries were palpable more frequently than left ovaries (P < 0.01). Ovaries were detected clinically in 30% of women > or = 55 years of age versus 51% of women <55 years of age (P < 0.05), in 9% of women weighing > or = 200 lb versus 55% of women weighing <200 lb (P < 0.001), and in 12% of women with a uterine weight > or = 200 g versus 51% of women with a uterine weight <200 g (P < 0.001). TVS was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in detecting ovaries in women with these high risk characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: TVS is significantly more accurate than clinical examination in detecting ovaries and in defining their dimensions. Ovaries frequently are not palpable in women > or = 55 years of age, women who weigh > or = 200 lb, or women with an enlarged uterus (> 200 g). The addition of TVS to annual pelvic examination may be beneficial in women > or = 55 years of age who are overweight and therefore at high risk to develop ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16084576     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  7 in total

Review 1.  The challenging pelvic examination.

Authors:  Carol K Bates; Nina Carroll; Jennifer Potter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Ovarian Cancer Incidence Corrected for Oophorectomy.

Authors:  Lauren A Baldwin; Quan Chen; Thomas C Tucker; Connie G White; Robert N Ore; Bin Huang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-01

3.  Symptoms Relevant to Surveillance for Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Robert M Ore; Lauren Baldwin; Dylan Woolum; Erika Elliott; Christiaan Wijers; Chieh-Yu Chen; Rachel W Miller; Christopher P DeSimone; Frederick R Ueland; Richard J Kryscio; John R van Nagell; Edward J Pavlik
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-20

4.  Early inflammatory response in epithelial ovarian tumor cyst fluids.

Authors:  Björg Kristjánsdóttir; Karolina Partheen; Eric T Fung; Christine Yip; Kristina Levan; Karin Sundfeldt
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Probability of fallopian tube and ovarian detection with transvaginal ultrasonography in normal women.

Authors:  Jason R Lefringhouse; Erin Neward; Frederick R Ueland; Lauren A Baldwin; Rachel W Miller; Christopher P DeSimone; Richard J Kryscio; John R van Nagell; Edward J Pavlik
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-18

6.  Ultrasonographic Visualization of the Ovaries to Detect Ovarian Cancer According to Age, Menopausal Status and Body Type.

Authors:  Edward J Pavlik; Emily Brekke; Justin Gorski; Lauren Baldwin-Branch; Rachel Miller; Christopher P DeSimone; Charles S Dietrich; Holly S Gallion; Frederick Rand Ueland; John R van Nagell
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06

7.  Subsequent Ultrasonographic Non-Visualization of the Ovaries Is Hastened in Women with Only One Ovary Visualized Initially.

Authors:  Edward J Pavlik; Hannah Fancher; Charles S Dietrich; John R van Nagell
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.