Literature DB >> 16082952

Comparison of a chemical and enzymatic extraction of arsenic from rice and an assessment of the arsenic absorption from contaminated water by cooked rice.

Amanda H Ackerman1, Patricia A Creed, Amy N Parks, Michael W Fricke, Carol A Schwegel, John T Creed, Douglas T Heitkemper, Nohora P Velal.   

Abstract

Rice is a target food for arsenic speciation based analyses because of its relatively high arsenic concentration and per capita consumption rates. Improved speciation data for rice can be helpful in estimating inorganic arsenic exposures in the U.S. and in endemic populations. The inorganic arsenic exposure for cooked rice should include both the arsenic in raw rice plus the arsenic absorbed from the water used to prepare it. The amount of arsenic absorbed from water by rice during preparation was assessed using five different types of rice cooked in both contaminated drinking water and arsenic-free reagent water. The rice samples were extracted using trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and speciated using IC-ICP-MS. The TFA procedure was able to extract 84-104% of the arsenic (As) from the five different cooked rice samples. Chromatographic recoveries ranged from 99% to 116%. The dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) and inorganic arsenic concentration ranged from 22 to 270 ng of As/g of rice and from 31 to 108 ng of As/g of rice, respectively, for samples cooked in reagent water. The overall recoveries, which relate the sum of the chromatographic species back to the total digested concentration, ranged from 89% to 117%. The absorption of arsenic by rice from the total volume of water [1:1 to 4:1 (water:rice)] used in cooking was between 89% and 105% for two different contaminated drinking water samples. A comparison of the TFA extraction to an enzymatic extraction was made using the five rice samples and NIST 1568a rice flour. The two extraction procedures produced good agreement for inorganic arsenic, DMA, and the overall recovery. Through the use of IC-ESI-MS/ MS with a parent ion of m/z 153 and fragment ions of m/z 138, 123, and 105, the structure dimethylthioarsinic acid was tentatively identified in two of the rice samples using the enzymatic extraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16082952     DOI: 10.1021/es048150n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of drinking water, raw rice and cooking of rice as arsenic exposure routes in three contrasting areas of West Bengal, India.

Authors:  Debapriya Mondal; Mayukh Banerjee; Manjari Kundu; Nilanjana Banerjee; Udayan Bhattacharya; Ashok K Giri; Bhaswati Ganguli; Sugata Sen Roy; David A Polya
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Extraction tool and matrix effects on arsenic speciation analysis in cell lines.

Authors:  Lucy Yehiayan; Nellymar Membreno; Shannon Matulis; Lawrence H Boise; Yong Cai
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 3.  Arsenic exposure in Latin America: biomarkers, risk assessments and related health effects.

Authors:  Tyler R McClintock; Yu Chen; Jochen Bundschuh; John T Oliver; Julio Navoni; Valentina Olmos; Edda Villaamil Lepori; Habibul Ahsan; Faruque Parvez
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Human exposure to dietary inorganic arsenic and other arsenic species: State of knowledge, gaps and uncertainties.

Authors:  Francesco Cubadda; Brian P Jackson; Kathryn L Cottingham; Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne; Margaret Kurzius-Spencer
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Evaluation of selenium in dietary supplements using elemental speciation.

Authors:  Kevin M Kubachka; Traci Hanley; Madhavi Mantha; Robert A Wilson; Travis M Falconer; Zena Kassa; Aline Oliveira; Julio Landero; Joseph Caruso
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 7.514

6.  Arsenic uptake and speciation in vegetables grown under greenhouse conditions.

Authors:  E Smith; A L Juhasz; J Weber
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Assessment of in vivo bioaccessibility of arsenic in dietary rice by a mass balance approach.

Authors:  Yi He; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Effect of cooking on arsenic concentration in rice.

Authors:  Oliva Atiaga; Luis M Nunes; Xosé L Otero
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 9.  Processing conditions, rice properties, health and environment.

Authors:  Poritosh Roy; Takahiro Orikasa; Hiroshi Okadome; Nobutaka Nakamura; Takeo Shiina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  In vitro intestinal bioavailability of arsenosugar metabolites and presystemic metabolism of thio-dimethylarsinic acid in Caco-2 cells.

Authors:  Larissa Leffers; Christoph A Wehe; Sabine Hüwel; Marc Bartel; Franziska Ebert; Mojtaba S Taleshi; Hans-Joachim Galla; Uwe Karst; Kevin A Francesconi; Tanja Schwerdtle
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.