BACKGROUND: Although recent animal studies have shown that SMAD4/DPC4 gene alterations are essential for late-stage intestinal tumorigenesis, the role of SMAD4/DPC4 gene alterations in primary human colorectal carcinomas is not fully understood. Therefore, we attempted to clarify the role of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene during tumor progression of colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Differences in allelic imbalance (AI) and mutations of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene between diploid and aneuploid populations were analyzed for 30 sporadic DNA multiploid colorectal carcinomas (used as a tumor progression model and defined as the coexistence of diploid and aneuploid cells within the same tumor). The crypt isolation technique was coupled with DNA cytometric sorting and a polymerase chain reaction assay. In addition, hypermethylation of the promoter region was examined to clarify whether inactivation of gene expression occurred. RESULTS: Although a SMAD4/DPC4 gene AI was detected in only 5 of 27 informative diploid populations, 25 of 27 aneuploid populations had a SMAD4/DPC4 gene AI. Mutation of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene was detected in only one aneuploid population of multiploid colorectal carcinomas, but not in the corresponding diploid population. In total, 20 available multiploid carcinomas were selected for methylation analysis, and no evidence of hypermethylation of the promoter region was found. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that, although mutation of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene and hypermethylation of the promoter region are infrequent events in colorectal tumorigenesis, AI at the SMAD4/DPC4 gene locus may play a key role in the progression of colorectal carcinomas.
BACKGROUND: Although recent animal studies have shown that SMAD4/DPC4 gene alterations are essential for late-stage intestinal tumorigenesis, the role of SMAD4/DPC4 gene alterations in primary humancolorectal carcinomas is not fully understood. Therefore, we attempted to clarify the role of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene during tumor progression of colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Differences in allelic imbalance (AI) and mutations of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene between diploid and aneuploid populations were analyzed for 30 sporadic DNA multiploid colorectal carcinomas (used as a tumor progression model and defined as the coexistence of diploid and aneuploid cells within the same tumor). The crypt isolation technique was coupled with DNA cytometric sorting and a polymerase chain reaction assay. In addition, hypermethylation of the promoter region was examined to clarify whether inactivation of gene expression occurred. RESULTS: Although a SMAD4/DPC4 gene AI was detected in only 5 of 27 informative diploid populations, 25 of 27 aneuploid populations had a SMAD4/DPC4 gene AI. Mutation of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene was detected in only one aneuploid population of multiploid colorectal carcinomas, but not in the corresponding diploid population. In total, 20 available multiploid carcinomas were selected for methylation analysis, and no evidence of hypermethylation of the promoter region was found. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that, although mutation of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene and hypermethylation of the promoter region are infrequent events in colorectal tumorigenesis, AI at the SMAD4/DPC4 gene locus may play a key role in the progression of colorectal carcinomas.
Authors: T Sugai; W Habano; S Nakamura; H Sato; N Uesugi; H Takahashi; Y Jiao; T Yoshida; C Itoh Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2000-11-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: E R Fearon; K R Cho; J M Nigro; S E Kern; J W Simons; J M Ruppert; S R Hamilton; A C Preisinger; G Thomas; K W Kinzler Journal: Science Date: 1990-01-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: R Salovaara; S Roth; A Loukola; V Launonen; P Sistonen; E Avizienyte; P Kristo; H Järvinen; S Souchelnytskyi; M Sarlomo-Rikala; L A Aaltonen Journal: Gut Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Lara Lipton; Sarah E Halford; Victoria Johnson; Marco R Novelli; Angela Jones; Carole Cummings; Ella Barclay; Oliver Sieber; Amir Sadat; Marie-Luise Bisgaard; Shirley V Hodgson; Lauri A Aaltonen; Huw J W Thomas; Ian P M Tomlinson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: C Mamot; G Mild; J Reuter; U Laffer; U Metzger; L Terracciano; J-L Boulay; R Herrmann; C Rochlitz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-02-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: E Taioli; M A Garza; Y O Ahn; D T Bishop; J Bost; B Budai; K Chen; F Gemignani; T Keku; C S P Lima; L Le Marchand; K Matsuo; V Moreno; J Plaschke; M Pufulete; S B Thomas; G Toffoli; C R Wolf; C G Moore; J Little Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Sung Kwan Shin; Takeshi Nagasaka; Barbara H Jung; Nagahide Matsubara; Won Ho Kim; John M Carethers; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2007-09-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Daniel Calva; Fadi S Dahdaleh; George Woodfield; Ronald J Weigel; Jennifer C Carr; Sathivel Chinnathambi; James R Howe Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 16.971