Priority setting for horizon scanning of new health technologies in Denmark: views of health care stakeholders and health economists.

In the context of the establishment of a Danish Horizon Scanning System (HSS) the views of health care stakeholders and health economists were solicited by means of postal surveys on the need for adaptation of a priority setting instrument for health technology assessment (HTA). The aim was to investigate if the instrument needed adaptation for priority setting in the context of a Danish HSS and, if so, how the instrument should be changed. A literature study served to enhance interpretation of the findings of the surveys and to formulate changes in the instrument that synthesize or bridge any differing views between the two groups. The results show that the instrument should apply a health care perspective, and that technologies should be prioritised on the basis of the criteria: marginal benefits, marginal costs, budget impact, impact on access to care, and additional criteria with an impact on health policy, such as the educational needs and organisational changes associated with the new technology. The proposed changes are regarded as an intermediate step in the process of producing a fully adapted instrument that can serve as a formal support for priority setting of new health technologies for assessment in the Danish HSS.