Literature DB >> 1608117

New evidence of the prevalence and scope of physician joint ventures.

J M Mitchell1, E Scott.   

Abstract

Physician ownership of health care businesses (outside their own practice) to which they refer patients has attracted considerable attention in the medical literature, in the media, and from federal and state policymakers. Despite the concerns raised about these ownership arrangements, known as joint ventures, the prevalence and scope of joint ventures involving physicians is not well documented. This report examines the prevalence and scope of physician joint ventures in Florida based on data collected under a legislative mandate. Our results indicate that physician ownership of health care businesses providing diagnostic testing or other ancillary services is common in Florida. While this conclusion is based on our comprehensive survey of health care businesses in Florida, it is at least indicative that such arrangements are likely to occur elsewhere. We find that at least 40% of Florida physicians involved in direct patient care have an investment interest in a health care business to which they may refer their patients for services; over 91% of the physician owners are concentrated in specialties that may refer patients for services. About 40% of the physician investors have a financial interest in diagnostic imaging centers. The estimates reported here indicate that the proportion of referring physicians involved in direct patient care who participate in joint ventures is much higher than previous estimates suggest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Medical Association; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1608117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  8 in total

Review 1.  Physician entrepreneurs, self-referral, and conflicts of interest: an overview.

Authors:  David M Zientek
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2003-06

2.  How did physician ownership become a federal case? The Stark Amendments and their prospects.

Authors:  Sarah M Stout; David C Warner
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2003-06

Review 3.  Stark regulation: a historical and current review of the self-referral laws.

Authors:  Morey J Kolber
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2006-03

4.  Regional variations in medical expenditure and hospitalization days for heart attack patients in Japan: evidence from the Tokai Acute Myocardial Study (TAMIS).

Authors:  Haruko Noguchi; Satoshi Shimizutani; Yuichiro Masuda
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2008-01-19

5.  "Self referral": a potential conflict of interest.

Authors:  P Wilkinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-24

6.  Conflict of interest, physicians and physiotherapy.

Authors:  M Waldman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Views of health system experts on macro factors of induced demand.

Authors:  Elahe Khorasani; Mahmoud Keyvanara; Saeed Karimi; Marzie Jafarian Jazi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-10

8.  Experts' perceptions of the concept of induced demand in healthcare: A qualitative study in Isfahan, Iran.

Authors:  Mahmoud Keyvanara; Saeed Karimi; Elahe Khorasani; Marzie Jafarian Jazi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2014-05-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.