BACKGROUND: There is no exact consensus about the usefulness of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion because of the diverse PCR methods and the different diagnostic criteria that are described in other studies. METHODS: We analyzed pleural effusion specimens obtained from 111 patients for whom the exclusion of the possibility of tuberculous pleural effusion was necessary. We performed M. tuberculosis PCR testing using the Cobas Amplicor MTB test (Roche Diagnostic Systems), which is fully automated and commercially available. RESULTS: Results of the M. tuberculosis PCR test of pleural effusion specimens were positive for 7 (17.1%) of the 41 patients with confirmed pleural tuberculosis and for 3 (18.8%) of the 16 patients with probable pleural tuberculosis. The overall sensitivity and specificity of M. tuberculosis PCR testing of pleural effusion were 17.5% and 98.1%, respectively. The sensitivity of M. tuberculosis PCR testing for each group of patients with tuberculous pleural effusion detected by smear-positive results, smear-negative and culture-positive results, and culture-negative and pleural biopsy-positive results, was 100.0%, 33.3%, and 3.7%, respectively. Of the 57 patients with pleural tuberculosis, only 3 (5.3%) had positive results of M. tuberculosis PCR testing along with negative results of smearing, negative results of pleural pathological analysis, and a low level of adenosine deaminase. CONCLUSION: For specimens such as pleural effusion, in which the bacillary load is very low, the clinical utility of PCR testing seems highly limited.
BACKGROUND: There is no exact consensus about the usefulness of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion because of the diverse PCR methods and the different diagnostic criteria that are described in other studies. METHODS: We analyzed pleural effusion specimens obtained from 111 patients for whom the exclusion of the possibility of tuberculous pleural effusion was necessary. We performed M. tuberculosis PCR testing using the Cobas Amplicor MTB test (Roche Diagnostic Systems), which is fully automated and commercially available. RESULTS: Results of the M. tuberculosis PCR test of pleural effusion specimens were positive for 7 (17.1%) of the 41 patients with confirmed pleural tuberculosis and for 3 (18.8%) of the 16 patients with probable pleural tuberculosis. The overall sensitivity and specificity of M. tuberculosis PCR testing of pleural effusion were 17.5% and 98.1%, respectively. The sensitivity of M. tuberculosis PCR testing for each group of patients with tuberculous pleural effusion detected by smear-positive results, smear-negative and culture-positive results, and culture-negative and pleural biopsy-positive results, was 100.0%, 33.3%, and 3.7%, respectively. Of the 57 patients with pleural tuberculosis, only 3 (5.3%) had positive results of M. tuberculosis PCR testing along with negative results of smearing, negative results of pleural pathological analysis, and a low level of adenosine deaminase. CONCLUSION: For specimens such as pleural effusion, in which the bacillary load is very low, the clinical utility of PCR testing seems highly limited.
Authors: Parameet Kumar; Manas K Sen; Devendra S Chauhan; Vishwa M Katoch; Sarman Singh; Hanumanthappa K Prasad Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-04-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Franciele Rosso; Candice T Michelon; Rosa D Sperhacke; Mirela Verza; Liliane Olival; Marcus B Conde; Renata L Guerra; Arnaldo Zaha; Maria Lr Rossetti Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2011-08-05