Literature DB >> 16080072

The efficacy and safety of tigecycline in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections: results of 2 double-blind phase 3 comparison studies with vancomycin-aztreonam.

E J Ellis-Grosse1, T Babinchak, N Dartois, G Rose, E Loh.   

Abstract

Two phase 3, double-blind studies in hospitalized adults with complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSI) determined the safety and efficacy of tigecycline versus that of vancomycin-aztreonam. Patients received tigecycline (100 mg, followed by 50 mg intravenously twice daily) or vancomycin (1 g intravenously twice daily) plus aztreonam (2 g intravenously twice daily) for up to 14 days. Populations were as follows: 1116 patients (566 treated with tigecycline, and 550 treated with vancomycin-aztreonam) constituted the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, 1057 patients (538 treated with tigecycline, and 519 treated with vancomycin-aztreonam) constituted the clinical mITT (c-mITT) population, and 833 patients (422 treated with tigecycline, and 411 treated with vancomycin-aztreonam) constituted the clinically evaluable population. Clinical responses to tigecycline and vancomycin-aztreonam at test-of-cure were similar: c-mITT, 79.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.1%-83.1%) versus 81.9% (95% CI, 78.3%-85.1%) (P = .4183); and clinically evaluable, 86.5% (95% CI, 82.9%-89.6%) versus 88.6% (95% CI, 85.1%-91.5%) (P = .4233). Adverse events were similar, with increased nausea and vomiting in the tigecycline group and increased rash and elevated hepatic aminotransferase levels in the vancomycin-aztreonam group. Tigecycline monotherapy is as safe and efficacious as the vancomycin-aztreonam combination in treating patients with cSSSI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16080072     DOI: 10.1086/431675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  78 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics of tigecycline in patients with complicated intra-abdominal or skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  S A Van Wart; J S Owen; E A Ludwig; A K Meagher; J M Korth-Bradley; B B Cirincione
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Tigecycline.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Monique P Curran
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Use of ribotyping to retrospectively identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from phase 3 clinical trials for tigecycline that are genotypically related to community-associated isolates.

Authors:  Fionnuala McAleese; Ellen Murphy; Timothy Babinchak; Guy Singh; Battouli Said-Salim; Barry Kreiswirth; Paul Dunman; John O'Connell; Steven J Projan; Patricia A Bradford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  New drugs to treat skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Gary E Stein
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Postantibiotic effect of tigecycline against 14 gram-positive organisms.

Authors:  G A Pankuch; P C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Antianaerobic antimicrobials: spectrum and susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Itzhak Brook; Hannah M Wexler; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Diabetic foot infections: microbiological aspects, current and future antibiotic therapy focusing on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Andreas Ambrosch; Simone Haefner; Edward Jude; Ralf Lobmann
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  In vitro activity of tigecycline against multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from a Belgian hospital.

Authors:  R Naesens; J P Ursi; J Van Schaeren; A Jeurissen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 9.  Newer antibacterial drugs for a new century.

Authors:  Gina Devasahayam; William M Scheld; Paul S Hoffman
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.206

10.  Results of a double-blind, randomized trial of ceftobiprole treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Gary J Noel; Richard S Strauss; Karen Amsler; Markus Heep; Rienk Pypstra; Joseph S Solomkin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.