Literature DB >> 16079954

The detection of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow comparing bright-field immunocytochemistry and multicolor immunofluorescence.

David N Krag1, Roberto Kusminsky, Edward Manna, Abiy Ambaye, Donald L Weaver, Seth P Harlow, Michael Covelli, Mary A Stanley, Laurence McCahill, Frank Ittleman, Bruce Leavitt, Martin Krag.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The detection of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow by immunocytochemistry (ICC) has been reported to predict progression of early-stage breast cancer. The most common staining procedure uses bright-field ICC with cytokeratin (CK) antibodies to label isolated tumor cells. However, this method can result in false-positive staining events. We used multicolor immunofluorescence (IF) to develop a more specific assay for detecting isolated tumor cells in marrow samples from breast cancer patients.
METHODS: We compared ICC and IF side by side for detection of cancer cells and false-positive staining events on bone marrow aspirates from breast cancer patients, bone marrow from healthy donors, and healthy donor blood spiked with cancer cells. The primary target for isolated tumor cell detection was CK for both methods. IF used an additional set of antibodies to label hematopoietic cells (HCs).
RESULTS: The detection rate of CK+ events in breast cancer patient bone marrow aspirates was 18 (58%) of 31 for ICC and 21 (68%) of 31 for IF. However, with IF, 17 of 21 CK+ cases were stained with HC markers and thus were identified as false-positive events. A surprisingly high CK+ event rate was observed in healthy donor blood and marrow. In all healthy donor samples, CK+ events were readily identified as HCs by IF. Detection sensitivity of spiked cancer cells in donor blood was similar for both methods.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a high frequency of CK+ events in blood and marrow, and it is important to note that this is observed both in patients with and those without cancer. IF with multiple HC markers allows straightforward discrimination between CK+ cells of hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16079954     DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2005.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  4 in total

1.  Association of ABCC2 and CDDP-Resistance in Two Sublines Resistant to CDDP Derived from a Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cell Line.

Authors:  Si Ming Xie; Wei Yi Fang; Teng Fei Liu; Kai Tai Yao; Xue Yun Zhong
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-06-13       Impact factor: 4.375

2.  Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients and noncancer donors.

Authors:  David N Krag; Roberto Kusminsky; Edward Manna; Donald Weaver; Seth P Harlow; Michael Covelli; Mary A Stanley; Laurence McCahill; Frank Ittleman; Bruce Leavitt; Martin Krag; Patricia Amarante
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2009-10

3.  Analysis of and prognostic information from disseminated tumour cells in bone marrow in primary breast cancer: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Anna-Karin Falck; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Christian Ingvar; Jorma Isola; Per-Ebbe Jönsson; Pia Lindblom; Kristina Lövgren; Karin Rennstam; Mårten Fernö; Lisa Rydén
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Enrichment with anti-cytokeratin alone or combined with anti-EpCAM antibodies significantly increases the sensitivity for circulating tumor cell detection in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Glenn Deng; Michael Herrler; David Burgess; Edward Manna; David Krag; Julian F Burke
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 6.466

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.