A Scott LaJoie1, Steven J McCabe, Binu Thomas, Stephen E Edgell. 1. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. lajoie@louisville.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of a diagnostic test used to classify a patient as having disease or being disease-free is a valuable piece of information to be used by the physician when making treatment decisions. If a standard reference test is available, determining the sensitivity and specificity of a new test is straightforward. However, if that reference test is incorrectly assumed to be perfectly sensitive and specific, the errors of the reference test can result in an underestimation of the accuracy of the test being evaluated. Latent class analysis can be applied to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a new test when no standard exists. METHODS: Latent class analysis was used to determine the accuracy rates of three commonly used measures of carpal tunnel syndrome: Tinel's sign, Phalen's test, and the nerve conduction velocity test. Data included 162 wrists from 81 patients seeking treatment for symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. RESULTS: Tinel's sign and Phalen's test were both highly sensitive (0.97 and 0.92, respectively) and specific (0.91 and 0.88, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of the nerve conduction velocity test were 0.93 and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSION: Estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of these common tests for carpal tunnel syndrome support their widespread clinical use.
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of a diagnostic test used to classify a patient as having disease or being disease-free is a valuable piece of information to be used by the physician when making treatment decisions. If a standard reference test is available, determining the sensitivity and specificity of a new test is straightforward. However, if that reference test is incorrectly assumed to be perfectly sensitive and specific, the errors of the reference test can result in an underestimation of the accuracy of the test being evaluated. Latent class analysis can be applied to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a new test when no standard exists. METHODS: Latent class analysis was used to determine the accuracy rates of three commonly used measures of carpal tunnel syndrome: Tinel's sign, Phalen's test, and the nerve conduction velocity test. Data included 162 wrists from 81 patients seeking treatment for symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. RESULTS: Tinel's sign and Phalen's test were both highly sensitive (0.97 and 0.92, respectively) and specific (0.91 and 0.88, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of the nerve conduction velocity test were 0.93 and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSION: Estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of these common tests for carpal tunnel syndrome support their widespread clinical use.
Authors: Geert A Buijze; Wouter H Mallee; Frank J P Beeres; Timothy E Hanson; Wesley O Johnson; David Ring Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-09-30 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Fauzia Javed Sheereen; Bibhuti Sarkar; Pallavi Sahay; Mohammad Abu Shaphe; Ahmad H Alghadir; Amir Iqbal; Taimul Ali; Fuzail Ahmad Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 2.667
Authors: Leonhard Gruber; Marnix T van Holsbeeck; Viviane Khoury; Christian Deml; Markus Franz Gabl; Werner Jaschke; Andrea Sabine Klauser Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Georgia Ntani; Keith T Palmer; Cathy Linaker; E Clare Harris; Richard Van der Star; Cyrus Cooper; David Coggon Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Hossein Ebrahimi; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Ahmad Khosravi; Hassan Hashemi; Akbar Fotouhi Journal: J Res Med Sci Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 1.852