Literature DB >> 16079456

Two types of bone resorption lacunae in the mouse parietal bones as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and histochemistry.

Shumei Ren1, Hiroko Takano, Kazuhiro Abe.   

Abstract

To understand the bone resorption process on the basis of the morphology of bone resorption lacunae, the inner surface of parietal bones in juvenile mice was exposed with a treatment of ultrasonic waves or NaOCl treatment and examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bone resorption lacunae were divided into two types (I and II) according to differences in morphological features of their walls; the wall of type I lacunae was covered with loose collagen fibrils, while that of type II lacunae was smooth with almost no fibrillar structures. Collagen fibrils in type I lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves differed in appearance from those treated with NaOCl; the collagen fibrils were thin and displayed a smooth surface in type I lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves, while they were thick and showed a rough surface in those treated with NaOCl-probably because superficial uncalcified collagen fibrils were digested with the chemical. The results indicated that type I lacunae occupied 77% of all of the bone resorption lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves, but 51% of those treated with NaOCl. This finding led to the idea that type I lacunae can be subdivided into two: lacunae (Ia), covered with partially calcified fibrils as well as superficial uncalcified fibrils; and lacunae (Ib), covered only with uncalcified fibrils. The presence of uncalcified fibrils in the bone resorption lacunae was further confirmed by backscattered electron (BSE) imaging of SEM. Histochemistry for acid phosphatase or immuno-histochemistry for cathepsin B or carbonic anhydrase in combination with SEM revealed that type I lacunae were located under osteoclasts but type II lacunae were not. These findings indicate that type I lacunae are in the process of bone resorption by osteoclasts, while type II lacunae are in the final stage of bone resorption and free from osteoclasts. Bone resorption may thus proceed in the order of Ia, Ib, and II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16079456     DOI: 10.1679/aohc.68.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Histol Cytol        ISSN: 0914-9465


  4 in total

1.  Nanoscale X-ray microscopic imaging of mammalian mineralized tissue.

Authors:  Joy C Andrews; Eduardo Almeida; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Joshua S Alwood; Chialing Lee; Yijin Liu; Jie Chen; Florian Meirer; Michael Feser; Jeff Gelb; Juana Rudati; Andrei Tkachuk; Wenbing Yun; Piero Pianetta
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 4.127

2.  50 years of scanning electron microscopy of bone-a comprehensive overview of the important discoveries made and insights gained into bone material properties in health, disease, and taphonomy.

Authors:  Furqan A Shah; Krisztina Ruscsák; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 13.567

3.  Imaging an adapted dentoalveolar complex.

Authors:  Ralf-Peter Herber; Justine Fong; Seth A Lucas; Sunita P Ho
Journal:  Anat Res Int       Date:  2012-01-19

4.  SEM BSE 3D Image Analysis of Human Incus Bone Affected by Cholesteatoma Ascribes to Osteoclasts the Bone Erosion and VpSEM dEDX Analysis Reveals New Bone Formation.

Authors:  Michela Relucenti; Selenia Miglietta; Gabriele Bove; Orlando Donfrancesco; Ezio Battaglione; Pietro Familiari; Claudio Barbaranelli; Edoardo Covelli; Maurizio Barbara; Giuseppe Familiari
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 1.932

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.