Literature DB >> 16078522

Community perceptions of adequate levels and reasons for skin protection.

Warren R Stanton1, Jenny Moffatt, Alexandra Clavarino.   

Abstract

In this study the authors addressed whether or not community members use relevant risk factors to determine an appropriate level of skin protection behavior in the prevention of skin cancer. The authors conducted a postal survey with a community sample of 3,600 Queensland residents that they randomly selected from the Commonwealth electoral roll. The predictors of "perceptions of doing enough skin protection" included intrapersonal, social, and attitudinal influences. People protected themselves from the sun primarily out of a desire for future good health and on other occasions did not protect themselves from the sun because they were not out there long enough to get burnt. The predictors of perceptions of doing enough skin protection indicated that participants were aware of relevant risk factors. The main reasons that people protect themselves from the sun suggest that they are acting on many health promotion messages. However, skin cancer prevention programs need to move beyond increasing awareness and knowledge of the disease to providing a supportive environment and enhancing individual skills. Health promotion campaigns could reinforce appropriate risk assessment and shape an individual's decision about how much sun protection is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16078522     DOI: 10.3200/BMED.31.1.5-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Med        ISSN: 0896-4289            Impact factor:   3.104


  8 in total

1.  Geography, facilities, and promotional strategies used to encourage indoor tanning in New York City.

Authors:  Corey H Brouse; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Charles E Basch; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-08

2.  Parent and child perspectives on perceived barriers to child sun protection and their association with sun protection strategies among children of melanoma survivors.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Bridget G Parsons; Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer L Hay; Kenneth M Boucher; Heloisa Caputo; Ryan Mooney; Douglas Grossman; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  A randomised controlled trial of a theory-based intervention to improve sun protective behaviour in adolescents ('you can still be HOT in the shade'): study protocol.

Authors:  Anna L Hawkes; Kyra Hamilton; Katherine M White; Ross McD Young
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  To protect or not to protect: examining reasons for sun protection among young women at risk for skin cancer.

Authors:  M V Auerbach; C J Heckman; S Darlow
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-03-27

Review 5.  Melanoma epidemiology and public health.

Authors:  Marianne Berwick; Esther Erdei; Jennifer Hay
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.478

6.  Study protocol: a randomised controlled trial of a theory-based online intervention to improve sun safety among Australian adults.

Authors:  Cathy M Cleary; Katherine M White; Ross McD Young; Anna L Hawkes; Stuart Leske; Louise C Starfelt; Kylie Wihardjo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  Screening and vaccination as determined by the Social Ecological Model and the Theory of Triadic Influence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anayawa Nyambe; Guido Van Hal; Jarl K Kampen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  A state of the science on influential factors related to sun protective behaviors to prevent skin cancer in adults.

Authors:  Amy F Bruce; Laurie Theeke; Jennifer Mallow
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2017-06-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.