Theodore Pincus1, Tuulikki Sokka, Hannu Kautiainen. 1. Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. t.pincus@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze a further version of the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) with 10 activities of daily living (ADL), which is more easily completed by patients and scored by health professionals than a 14-ADL MDHAQ; and to determine if the 10-ADL MDHAQ would be as informative as the 14-ADL MDHAQ, the 20-ADL HAQ, and the 8-ADL modified HAQ (MHAQ), which is more easily reviewed and scored than the HAQ, but scores are routinely 0.3-0.5 units lower than HAQ scores. METHODS: In standard care, 144 consecutive patients completed a HAQ, which includes a MHAQ, and 14-ADL MDHAQ, which includes a 10-ADL MDHAQ subscale, all scored 0-3. These scales were analyzed for mean and median scores, Cronbach's alpha to estimate internal consistency, factor analysis to estimate construct validity, and cumulative percentile scores. RESULTS: Mean (median) scores for the HAQ, MHAQ, 14-ADL MDHAQ, and 10-ADL MDHAQ physical function scales were 0.80 (0.75), 0.48 (0.38), 0.83 (0.79), and 0.73 (0.70), respectively. Internal consistency of each scale was very good. The lowest 25 percentile score was 0.16 on the HAQ, 0.0 on the MHAQ, 0.36 on the 14-ADL MDHAQ, and 0.20 on the 10-ADL MDHAQ. CONCLUSION: The MDHAQ physical function scale of 10 ADL is more easily completed and scored than the 14-ADL MDHAQ or 20-ADL HAQ, while providing similar information.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze a further version of the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) with 10 activities of daily living (ADL), which is more easily completed by patients and scored by health professionals than a 14-ADL MDHAQ; and to determine if the 10-ADL MDHAQ would be as informative as the 14-ADL MDHAQ, the 20-ADL HAQ, and the 8-ADL modified HAQ (MHAQ), which is more easily reviewed and scored than the HAQ, but scores are routinely 0.3-0.5 units lower than HAQ scores. METHODS: In standard care, 144 consecutive patients completed a HAQ, which includes a MHAQ, and 14-ADL MDHAQ, which includes a 10-ADL MDHAQ subscale, all scored 0-3. These scales were analyzed for mean and median scores, Cronbach's alpha to estimate internal consistency, factor analysis to estimate construct validity, and cumulative percentile scores. RESULTS: Mean (median) scores for the HAQ, MHAQ, 14-ADL MDHAQ, and 10-ADL MDHAQ physical function scales were 0.80 (0.75), 0.48 (0.38), 0.83 (0.79), and 0.73 (0.70), respectively. Internal consistency of each scale was very good. The lowest 25 percentile score was 0.16 on the HAQ, 0.0 on the MHAQ, 0.36 on the 14-ADL MDHAQ, and 0.20 on the 10-ADL MDHAQ. CONCLUSION: The MDHAQ physical function scale of 10 ADL is more easily completed and scored than the 14-ADL MDHAQ or 20-ADL HAQ, while providing similar information.
Authors: Eric S Kiechle; Stacy Cooper Bailey; Laurie A Hedlund; Anthony J Viera; Stacey L Sheridan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Claire E H Barber; JoAnn Zell; Jinoos Yazdany; Aileen M Davis; Laura Cappelli; Linda Ehrlich-Jones; Donna Everix; J Carter Thorne; Victoria Bohm; Lisa Suter; Alex Limanni; Kaleb Michaud Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Benjamin J Miriovsky; Kaleb Michaud; Geoffrey M Thiele; James R O'Dell; Grant W Cannon; Gail Kerr; J Steuart Richards; Dannette Johnson; Liron Caplan; Andreas Reimold; Roderick Hooker; Ted R Mikuls Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-05-03 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Bryant R England; Benedict K Tiong; Martin J Bergman; Jeffrey R Curtis; Salahuddin Kazi; Ted R Mikuls; James R O'Dell; Veena K Ranganath; Alex Limanni; Lisa G Suter; Kaleb Michaud Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: H Singh; V Gupta; S Ray; H Kumar; P Talapatra; M Kaur; S Kumar; S Arya; R Mathur; N Ghangas Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2012-09-15 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Tuulikki Sokka; Sergio Toloza; Maurizio Cutolo; Hannu Kautiainen; Heidi Makinen; Feride Gogus; Vlado Skakic; Humeira Badsha; Tõnu Peets; Asta Baranauskaite; Pál Géher; Ilona Ujfalussy; Fotini N Skopouli; Maria Mavrommati; Rieke Alten; Christof Pohl; Jean Sibilia; Andrea Stancati; Fausto Salaffi; Wojciech Romanowski; Danuta Zarowny-Wierzbinska; Dan Henrohn; Barry Bresnihan; Patricia Minnock; Lene Surland Knudsen; Johannes Wg Jacobs; Jaime Calvo-Alen; Juris Lazovskis; Geraldo da Rocha Castelar Pinheiro; Dmitry Karateev; Daina Andersone; Sylejman Rexhepi; Yusuf Yazici; Theodore Pincus Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 5.156