Literature DB >> 16078239

Implant surface roughness influences osteoclast proliferation and differentiation.

Marco Marchisio1, Maristella Di Carmine, Rita Pagone, Adriano Piattelli, Sebastiano Miscia.   

Abstract

The osteoclast is a hematopoietic cell derived from CFU-GM and branches from the monocyte-macrophage lineage during the differentiation process. Biological environment appears to be crucial for osteoclast formation and activity. It has been reported that bone remodeling following implant placement requires a coordinated activity by osteoclasts and osteoblasts. The response of such cells at the bone-implant interface has been suggested to be affected by the structural and morphological features of the biomaterial surface. To shed more light on this topic we performed a multiparametric analysis of murine monocytes response to different titanium surfaces. These cells, RAW 264.7 type TIB-71, represent a very useful system because they differentiate into osteoclasts following treatment of definite doses of the osteoclast-differentiation factor RANKL and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF). Cells, cultured on glass (control), on grade 3 machined and on titanium pull-spray superficial-TPSS surfaces disclosed profound different responses in terms of morphological rearrangements, adhesion, and differentiation abilities. Indeed, after 14 days, cells cultured on glass and machined surfaces were uniformly distributed, while, on the TPSS surface cells strictly aggregated into small isolated clusters were observed. In addition, cells cultured on the machined surface displayed a higher adhesion ability, while cells cultured on the rougher surface disclosed a more evident capability to differentiate. These results could explain the higher bone-implant contact percentage found around implants with rougher surfaces and suggest that osteoclasts may play an important role in the initial period after implant placement to prime or prepare the implant surface for the osteoblast activity. Copyright (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16078239     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  15 in total

1.  Effects of surface microtopography on the assembly of the osteoclast resorption apparatus.

Authors:  Dafna Geblinger; Christian Zink; Nicholas D Spencer; Lia Addadi; Benjamin Geiger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Nano-topography sensing by osteoclasts.

Authors:  Dafna Geblinger; Lia Addadi; Benjamin Geiger
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading.

Authors:  M J P Biggs; R G Richards; N Gadegaard; C D W Wilkinson; M J Dalby
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Surface microtopography modulates sealing zone development in osteoclasts cultured on bone.

Authors:  Michal Shemesh; Lia Addadi; Benjamin Geiger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Bioinspired polydopamine and polyphenol tannic acid functionalized titanium suppress osteoclast differentiation: a facile and efficient strategy to regulate osteoclast activity at bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Chris Steffi; Zhilong Shi; Chee Hoe Kong; Wilson Wang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Effects of TiO2 nanotube layers on RAW 264.7 macrophage behaviour and bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression.

Authors:  S J Sun; W Q Yu; Y L Zhang; X Q Jiang; F Q Zhang
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.831

7.  Zoledronic acid at subtoxic dose extends osteoblastic stage span of primary human osteoblasts.

Authors:  Susi Zara; Marianna De Colli; Viviana di Giacomo; Vincenzo Luca Zizzari; Chiara Di Nisio; Umberto Di Tore; Vincenzo Salini; Marialucia Gallorini; Stefano Tetè; Amelia Cataldi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions.

Authors:  Manus Jonathan Paul Biggs; R Geoff Richards; Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.307

9.  Focal adhesions in osteoneogenesis.

Authors:  M J P Biggs; M J Dalby
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.617

10.  Small-sized granules of biphasic bone substitutes support fast implant bed vascularization.

Authors:  M Barbeck; M Dard; M Kokkinopoulou; J Markl; P Booms; R A Sader; C J Kirkpatrick; S Ghanaati
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.