OBJECTIVE: Ischemic heart failure is an increasingly prevalent global health concern with major morbidity and mortality. Currently, therapies are limited, and novel revascularization methods might have a role. This study examined enhancing endogenous myocardial revascularization by expanding bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells with the marrow stimulant granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor and recruiting the endothelial progenitor cells with intramyocardial administration of the potent endothelial progenitor cell chemokine stromal cell-derived factor. METHODS: Ischemic cardiomyopathy was induced in Lewis rats (n = 40) through left anterior descending coronary artery ligation. After 3 weeks, animals were randomized into 4 groups: saline control, granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor only (GM-CSF only), stromal cell-derived factor only (SDF only), and combined stromal cell-derived factor/granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (SDF/GM-CSF) (n = 10 each). After another 3 weeks, hearts were analyzed for endothelial progenitor cell density by endothelial progenitor cell marker colocalization immunohistochemistry, vasculogenesis by von Willebrand immunohistochemistry, ventricular geometry by hematoxylin-and-eosin microscopy, and in vivo myocardial function with an intracavitary pressure-volume conductance microcatheter. RESULTS: The saline control, GM-CSF only, and SDF only groups were equivalent. Compared with the saline control group, animals in the SDF/GM-CSF group exhibited increased endothelial progenitor cell density (21.7 +/- 3.2 vs 9.6 +/- 3.1 CD34 + /vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-positive cells per high-power field, P = .01). There was enhanced vascularity (44.1 +/- 5.5 versus 23.8 +/- 2.2 von Willebrand factor-positive vessels per high-power field, P = .007). SDF/GM-CSF group animals experienced less adverse ventricular remodeling, as manifested by less cavitary dilatation (9.8 +/- 0.1 mm vs 10.1 +/- 0.1 mm [control], P = .04) and increased border-zone wall thickness (1.78 +/- 0.19 vs 1.41 +/- 0.16 mm [control], P = .03). (SDF/GM-CSF group animals had improved cardiac function compared with animals in the saline control group (maximum pressure: 93.9 +/- 3.2 vs 71.7 +/- 3.1 mm Hg, P < .001; maximum dP/dt: 3513 +/- 303 vs 2602 +/- 201 mm Hg/s, P < .05; cardiac output: 21.3 +/- 2.7 vs 13.3 +/- 1.3 mL/min, P < .01; end-systolic pressure-volume relationship slope: 1.7 +/- 0.4 vs 0.5 +/- 0.2 mm Hg/microL, P < .01.) CONCLUSION: This novel revascularization strategy of bone marrow stimulation and intramyocardial delivery of the endothelial progenitor cell chemokine stromal cell-derived factor yielded significantly enhanced myocardial endothelial progenitor cell density, vasculogenesis, geometric preservation, and contractility in a model of ischemic cardiomyopathy.
OBJECTIVE: Ischemic heart failure is an increasingly prevalent global health concern with major morbidity and mortality. Currently, therapies are limited, and novel revascularization methods might have a role. This study examined enhancing endogenous myocardial revascularization by expanding bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells with the marrow stimulant granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor and recruiting the endothelial progenitor cells with intramyocardial administration of the potent endothelial progenitor cell chemokine stromal cell-derived factor. METHODS:Ischemic cardiomyopathy was induced in Lewis rats (n = 40) through left anterior descending coronary artery ligation. After 3 weeks, animals were randomized into 4 groups: saline control, granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor only (GM-CSF only), stromal cell-derived factor only (SDF only), and combined stromal cell-derived factor/granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (SDF/GM-CSF) (n = 10 each). After another 3 weeks, hearts were analyzed for endothelial progenitor cell density by endothelial progenitor cell marker colocalization immunohistochemistry, vasculogenesis by von Willebrand immunohistochemistry, ventricular geometry by hematoxylin-and-eosin microscopy, and in vivo myocardial function with an intracavitary pressure-volume conductance microcatheter. RESULTS: The saline control, GM-CSF only, and SDF only groups were equivalent. Compared with the saline control group, animals in the SDF/GM-CSF group exhibited increased endothelial progenitor cell density (21.7 +/- 3.2 vs 9.6 +/- 3.1 CD34 + /vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-positive cells per high-power field, P = .01). There was enhanced vascularity (44.1 +/- 5.5 versus 23.8 +/- 2.2 von Willebrand factor-positive vessels per high-power field, P = .007). SDF/GM-CSF group animals experienced less adverse ventricular remodeling, as manifested by less cavitary dilatation (9.8 +/- 0.1 mm vs 10.1 +/- 0.1 mm [control], P = .04) and increased border-zone wall thickness (1.78 +/- 0.19 vs 1.41 +/- 0.16 mm [control], P = .03). (SDF/GM-CSF group animals had improved cardiac function compared with animals in the saline control group (maximum pressure: 93.9 +/- 3.2 vs 71.7 +/- 3.1 mm Hg, P < .001; maximum dP/dt: 3513 +/- 303 vs 2602 +/- 201 mm Hg/s, P < .05; cardiac output: 21.3 +/- 2.7 vs 13.3 +/- 1.3 mL/min, P < .01; end-systolic pressure-volume relationship slope: 1.7 +/- 0.4 vs 0.5 +/- 0.2 mm Hg/microL, P < .01.) CONCLUSION: This novel revascularization strategy of bone marrow stimulation and intramyocardial delivery of the endothelial progenitor cell chemokine stromal cell-derived factor yielded significantly enhanced myocardial endothelial progenitor cell density, vasculogenesis, geometric preservation, and contractility in a model of ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Authors: Bryan B Edwards; Alexander S Fairman; Jeffrey E Cohen; John W MacArthur; Andrew B Goldstone; Jeffrey B Woo; William Hiesinger; Y Joseph Woo Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Ann C Gaffey; Minna H Chen; Chantel M Venkataraman; Alen Trubelja; Christopher B Rodell; Patrick V Dinh; George Hung; John W MacArthur; Renganaden V Soopan; Jason A Burdick; Pavan Atluri Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Yaohong Tan; Hongwei Shao; Darwin Eton; Zhe Yang; Luis Alonso-Diaz; Hongkun Zhang; Andrew Schulick; Alan S Livingstone; Hong Yu Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2006-12-23 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Michael Simons; Kari Alitalo; Brian H Annex; Hellmut G Augustin; Craig Beam; Bradford C Berk; Tatiana Byzova; Peter Carmeliet; William Chilian; John P Cooke; George E Davis; Anne Eichmann; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe; Eli Keshet; Albert J Sinusas; Christiana Ruhrberg; Y Joseph Woo; Stefanie Dimmeler Journal: Circ Res Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: William Hiesinger; Matthew J Brukman; Ryan C McCormick; J Raymond Fitzpatrick; John R Frederick; Elaine C Yang; Jeffrey R Muenzer; Nicole A Marotta; Mark F Berry; Pavan Atluri; Y Joseph Woo Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: G P Fadini; S Sartore; M Schiavon; M Albiero; I Baesso; A Cabrelle; C Agostini; A Avogaro Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2006-10-27 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: John W MacArthur; Alen Trubelja; Yasuhiro Shudo; Philip Hsiao; Alexander S Fairman; Elaine Yang; William Hiesinger; Joseph J Sarver; Pavan Atluri; Y Joseph Woo Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: John W Macarthur; Jeffrey E Cohen; Jeremy R McGarvey; Yasuhiro Shudo; Jay B Patel; Alen Trubelja; Alexander S Fairman; Bryan B Edwards; George Hung; William Hiesinger; Andrew B Goldstone; Pavan Atluri; Robert L Wilensky; James J Pilla; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Y Joseph Woo Journal: Circ Res Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 17.367