Literature DB >> 16077303

Osteogenic capacities of periost grafts, periost flaps and prefabricated periosteal flaps: experimental study.

Turgut Ortak1, Ragip Ozdemir, Afşin Uysal, M Gürhan Ulusoy, Nezih Sungur, Belma Sahin, Uğur Koçer, Omer Sensöz.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of the bone defects due to various causes is still one of the challenging problems in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Periosteum is accepted to be the essential source for the repair of the bone tissue, which constitutes the basis of the support and the mobility functions of the surrounding tissues. Periosteal grafts and flaps have been used for various purposes by numerous techniques. The osteogenic activity of the periosteal tissues has a great importance regarding the purposes of reconstruction. In this experimental study, 20 New Zealand rabbits were used for the evaluation and the comparison of the osteogenic activities of periosteal grafts, periosteal flaps and prefabricated periosteal flaps. Morphological, histopathological and scinthigraphical observations were carried out for the assessment and the comparison of the groups after a follow-up of 12 weeks. Two of the animals were left out as a result of infection. The results showed that periosteal flaps had a much faster and more stable reconstructive capacity of osteogenesis, whereas prefabricated periosteal flaps had an osteogenic capacity of a lower degree and periosteal grafts apparently less than the former groups. We believe that this study confirms the reconstructive capacity of prefabricated periosteal flaps as an alternative to periosteal flaps for the repair of osseous tissues as well as indicating the osteogenic capacity of the periosteal grafts, though in a lesser degree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16077303     DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000168773.71356.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  Biological Principles and Physiology of Bone Regeneration under the Schneiderian Membrane after Sinus Lift Surgery: A Radiological Study in 14 Patients Treated with the Transcrestal Hydrodynamic Ultrasonic Cavitational Sinus Lift (Intralift).

Authors:  A Troedhan; A Kurrek; M Wainwright
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-06-17

2.  Increase in periosteal angiogenesis through heat shock conditioning.

Authors:  Majeed Rana; Constantin von See; Martin Rücker; Paul Schumann; Harald Essig; Horst Kokemüller; Daniel Lindhorst; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Periosteal medial femoral condyle free flap for metacarpal nonunion.

Authors:  Thierry Christen; Swenn M Krähenbühl; Camillo T Müller; Sébastien Durand
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 2.080

4.  Biomechanical Stability of Dental Implants in Augmented Maxillary Sites: Results of a Randomized Clinical Study with Four Different Biomaterials and PRF and a Biological View on Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Troedhan Angelo; Wainwright Marcel; Kurrek Andreas; Schlichting Izabela
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The vascularized periosteum flap as novel tissue engineering model for repair of cartilage defects.

Authors:  Leila Harhaus; Jung-Ju Huang; Shu-Wei Kao; Yen-Lin Wu; Gina Alicia Mackert; Bernd Höner; Ming-Huei Cheng; Ulrich Kneser; Chao-Min Cheng
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.310

6.  Comparison of the wound healing efficacy of polyglycolic acid sheets with fibrin glue and gelatin sponge dressings in a rat cranial periosteal defect model.

Authors:  Shinya Koshinuma; Shoko Murakami; Masaharu Noi; Takuya Murakami; Ken-Ichi Mukaisho; Hiroyuki Sugihara; Gaku Yamamoto
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2016-07-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.