Literature DB >> 16077295

Hypotensive anesthesia and recovery of cognitive function in long-term craniofacial surgery.

Valentina Caverni1, Giovanni Rosa, Giovanni Pinto, Paolo Tordiglione, Roberto Favaro.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare three different anesthesiological techniques with regard to hemodynamics, recovery, and postoperative morbidity, for craniofacial surgery. One hundred twenty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of I or II patients, 18 to 32 years old, and undergoing maxillary and mandibular osteotomies were randomly assigned to receive anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil (group P), desflurane-remifentanil (group D), or sevoflurane-remifentanil (group S). All patients were given premedication: midazolam 0.03 mg/kg, atropine 0.007 mg/kg, desametasone 0.1 mg/kg, NaCl 0.9% 100 mL + 2 mg/kg ketoprofene + 1.5 mg/kg ranitidine + 1 microg/kg clonidine. Anesthesia was induced by O2/air (FiO2 0.5), remifentanil 0.5 microg/kg/min, propofol 2 mg/kg, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. Maintenance group P received O2/air (FiO2 0.5), remifentanil 0.25 to 1.5 microg/kg/min, propofol 6 to 10 mg/kg/h; groups D and S received O2/air (FiO2 0.5), remifentanil 0.25 to 1.5 microg/kg/min, and respectively, sevoflurane or desflurane 0.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration. The dosage of propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane, obtained with a value of bispectral index (BIS) 40, was kept unchanged throughout the course, and remifentanil was titrated to maintain controlled hypotension: systolic arterial blood pressure 70 to 90 mmHg and mean arterial blood pressure 50 to 65 mmHg. A 24-hour elastomeric infusion system (ketoprofene 320 mg) was started 60 minutes before induction and cloridrat ondansetron 0.1 mg/kg was administered 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Hypotension was successfully obtained in all three groups with a bloodless surgical field, and there was no need for additional use of a potent hypotensive agent. Early and late recovery were faster and more complete in the D group; P < 0.05. Postoperative morbidity (nausea, vomiting, shivering, pain, and edema) was slight and did not significantly differ among the groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16077295     DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000159084.60049.e6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  5 in total

1.  Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Tulio Rossi; Murilo Navarro de Oliveira; Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal; Walbert de Andrade Vieira; Cristiano Elias Figueiredo; Cauane Blumenberg; Vinicius Lima de Almeida; Luiz Renato Paranhos; Luciana Butini Oliveira; Walter Luiz Siqueira; Rui Barbosa de Brito Júnior
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparative Evaluation of Hypotensive and Normotensive Anesthesia on LeFort I Osteotomies: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Abhivyakti Tewari; Gaurav Singh; Madan Mishra; Amit Gaur; Deepanshu Mallan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-01-17

3.  Desflurane - revisited.

Authors:  Mukul Chandra Kapoor; Mahesh Vakamudi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01

4.  Comparative evaluation of cost effectiveness and recovery profile between propofol and sevoflurane in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yashpal Singh; Anil P Singh; Gaurav Jain; Ghanshyam Yadav; Dinesh Kumar Singh
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2015 May-Aug

5.  Evaluation of the efficacy of desflurane with or without labetalol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear microsurgery.

Authors:  Neha Gupta; Vandana Talwar; Smita Prakash; Achyut Deuri; Anoop Raj Gogia
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.