Jonathan E Allen1, Steven L Salzberg. 1. Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, College Park, MD 20742, USA. jeallen@umiacs.umd.edu
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Computational gene finding systems play an important role in finding new human genes, although no systems are yet accurate enough to predict all or even most protein-coding regions perfectly. Ab initio programs can be augmented by evidence such as expression data or protein sequence homology, which improves their performance. The amount of such evidence continues to grow, but computational methods continue to have difficulty predicting genes when the evidence is conflicting or incomplete. Genome annotation pipelines collect a variety of types of evidence about gene structure and synthesize the results, which can then be refined further through manual, expert curation of gene models. RESULTS: JIGSAW is a new gene finding system designed to automate the process of predicting gene structure from multiple sources of evidence, with results that often match the performance of human curators. JIGSAW computes the relative weight of different lines of evidence using statistics generated from a training set, and then combines the evidence using dynamic programming. Our results show that JIGSAW's performance is superior to ab initio gene finding methods and to other pipelines such as Ensembl. Even without evidence from alignment to known genes, JIGSAW can substantially improve gene prediction accuracy as compared with existing methods. AVAILABILITY: JIGSAW is available as an open source software package at http://cbcb.umd.edu/software/jigsaw.
MOTIVATION: Computational gene finding systems play an important role in finding new human genes, although no systems are yet accurate enough to predict all or even most protein-coding regions perfectly. Ab initio programs can be augmented by evidence such as expression data or protein sequence homology, which improves their performance. The amount of such evidence continues to grow, but computational methods continue to have difficulty predicting genes when the evidence is conflicting or incomplete. Genome annotation pipelines collect a variety of types of evidence about gene structure and synthesize the results, which can then be refined further through manual, expert curation of gene models. RESULTS: JIGSAW is a new gene finding system designed to automate the process of predicting gene structure from multiple sources of evidence, with results that often match the performance of human curators. JIGSAW computes the relative weight of different lines of evidence using statistics generated from a training set, and then combines the evidence using dynamic programming. Our results show that JIGSAW's performance is superior to ab initio gene finding methods and to other pipelines such as Ensembl. Even without evidence from alignment to known genes, JIGSAW can substantially improve gene prediction accuracy as compared with existing methods. AVAILABILITY: JIGSAW is available as an open source software package at http://cbcb.umd.edu/software/jigsaw.
Authors: David DeCaprio; Jade P Vinson; Matthew D Pearson; Philip Montgomery; Matthew Doherty; James E Galagan Journal: Genome Res Date: 2007-08-09 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Rami A Dalloul; Julie A Long; Aleksey V Zimin; Luqman Aslam; Kathryn Beal; Le Ann Blomberg; Pascal Bouffard; David W Burt; Oswald Crasta; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Kristal Cooper; Roger A Coulombe; Supriyo De; Mary E Delany; Jerry B Dodgson; Jennifer J Dong; Clive Evans; Karin M Frederickson; Paul Flicek; Liliana Florea; Otto Folkerts; Martien A M Groenen; Tim T Harkins; Javier Herrero; Steve Hoffmann; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Andrew Jiang; Pieter de Jong; Pete Kaiser; Heebal Kim; Kyu-Won Kim; Sungwon Kim; David Langenberger; Mi-Kyung Lee; Taeheon Lee; Shrinivasrao Mane; Guillaume Marcais; Manja Marz; Audrey P McElroy; Thero Modise; Mikhail Nefedov; Cédric Notredame; Ian R Paton; William S Payne; Geo Pertea; Dennis Prickett; Daniela Puiu; Dan Qioa; Emanuele Raineri; Magali Ruffier; Steven L Salzberg; Michael C Schatz; Chantel Scheuring; Carl J Schmidt; Steven Schroeder; Stephen M J Searle; Edward J Smith; Jacqueline Smith; Tad S Sonstegard; Peter F Stadler; Hakim Tafer; Zhijian Jake Tu; Curtis P Van Tassell; Albert J Vilella; Kelly P Williams; James A Yorke; Liqing Zhang; Hong-Bin Zhang; Xiaojun Zhang; Yang Zhang; Kent M Reed Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Taner Z Sen; Carson M Andorf; Mary L Schaeffer; Lisa C Harper; Michael E Sparks; Jon Duvick; Volker P Brendel; Ethalinda Cannon; Darwin A Campbell; Carolyn J Lawrence Journal: Database (Oxford) Date: 2009-12-07 Impact factor: 3.451