Literature DB >> 16076699

The radiobiology of prostate cancer including new aspects of fractionated radiotherapy.

Jack F Fowler1.   

Abstract

Total radiation dose is not a reliable measure of biological effect when dose-per-fraction or dose-rate is changed. Large differences in biological effectiveness (per gray) are seen between the 2 Gy doses of external beam radiotherapy and the large boost doses given at high dose-rate from afterloading sources. The effects are profoundly different in rapidly or slowly proliferating tissues, that is for most tumors versus late complications. These differences work the opposite way round for prostate tumors versus late complications compared with most other types of tumor. Using the Linear-Quadratic formula it is aimed to explain these differences, especially for treatments of prostate cancer. The unusually slow growth rate of prostate cancers is associated with their high sensitivity to increased fraction size, so a large number of small fractions, such as 35 or 40 "daily" doses of 2 Gy, is not an optimum treatment. Theoretical modeling shows a stronger enhancement of tumor effect than of late complications for larger (and fewer) fractions, in prostate tumors uniquely. Biologically Effective Doses and Normalized Total Doses (in 2 Gy fraction equivalents) are given for prostate tumor, late rectal reactions, and--a new development--acute rectal mucosa. Tables showing the change of fraction-size sensitivity (the alpha/beta ratio) with proliferation rates of tissues lead to the association of slow cell doubling times in prostate tumors with small alpha/beta ratios. Clinical evidence to confirm this biological expectation is reviewed. The alpha/beta ratios of prostate tumors appear to be as low as 1.5 Gy (95% confidence interval 1.3-1.8 Gy), in contrast with the value of about 10 Gy for most other types of tumor. The important point is that alpha/beta =1.5 Gy appears to be significantly less than the alpha/beta =3 Gy for late complications in rectal tissues. Such differences are also emerging from recent clinical results. From this important difference stems the superior schedules of, for example, 20 fractions of 3 Gy, or 10 fractions of 4.7 Gy, or 5 fractions of 7 Gy, which can all give tumor results equivalent to 80-90 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, while keeping late complications equivalent to only 72 Gy in 2 Gy fractions. Combination treatments of external beam (EBRT) and brachytherapy boost doses (25F x 2 Gy plus 2 x 10 Gy) can give higher biological tumor effects than any EBRT using daily 2 Gy doses, and with acceptable late complications. Monotherapy by brachytherapy for low-risk cancer prostate using two to four fractions in a few days can give even higher biological effects on the tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16076699     DOI: 10.1080/02841860410002824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  102 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor on: A. Siegmann et al. Dose escalation for patients with decreasing PSA during radiotherapy for elevated PSA after radical prostatectomy improves biochemical progression-free survival. Results of a retrospective study. In: Strahlenther Onkol 2011;187:467-72 (No. 8) (DOI 10.1007/s00066-011-2229-3). P. Ghadjar, D. Zwahlen, D.M. Aebersold: Selection bias is not a good reason for dose intensification in patients with PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Pirus Ghadjar
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  21 years of biologically effective dose.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The mismatch repair and base excision repair pathways: an opportunity for individualized (personalized) sensitization of cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sean P Collins; Anatoly Dritschilo
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.742

4.  Evaluating proton stereotactic body radiotherapy to reduce chest wall dose in the treatment of lung cancer.

Authors:  Arya Amini; Katherine Ciura; James Welsh; Ngoc Nguyen; Matt Palmer; Pamela K Allen; Michael Paolini; Zhongxing Liao; Jaques Bluett; Radhe Mohan; Daniel Gomez; James D Cox; Ritsuko Komaki; Joe Y Chang
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.482

5.  Comment by J. Schäfer, G. Welzel, F. Wenz on D. Norkus et al. A randomized trial comparing hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated three-dimensional external-beam radiotherapy for localized prostate adenocarcinoma. a report on acute toxicity : in: Strahlenther Onkol 2009;185: 715-21 (No. 11) (DOI 10.1007/s00066-009-1982-z).

Authors:  Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Investigation of 90Y-avidin for prostate cancer brachytherapy: a dosimetric model for a phase I-II clinical study.

Authors:  Francesca Botta; Marta Cremonesi; Mahila E Ferrari; Ernesto Amato; Francesco Guerriero; Andrea Vavassori; Anna Sarnelli; Stefano Severi; Guido Pedroli; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Image-guided hypofractionated proton beam therapy for low-risk prostate cancer: Analysis of quality of life and toxicity, PCG GU 002.

Authors:  Carlos Enrique Vargas; William Fred Hartsell; Megan Dunn; Sameer Ramchandra Keole; Lucius Doh; John Chang; Gary Lynn Larson
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-03-04

8.  Moderate hypofractionation and simultaneous integrated boost with volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) for prostate cancer. Report of feasibility and acute toxicity.

Authors:  F Alongi; A Fogliata; P Navarria; A Tozzi; P Mancosu; F Lobefalo; G Reggiori; A Clivio; L Cozzi; M Scorsetti
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  A feasibility dosimetric study on prostate cancer : are we ready for a multicenter clinical trial on SBRT?

Authors:  Carmelo Marino; Elena Villaggi; Giulia Maggi; Marco Esposito; Lidia Strigari; Elisa Bonanno; Giusi R Borzì; Claudia Carbonini; Rita Consorti; David Fedele; Christian Fiandra; Isidora Ielo; Tiziana Malatesta; Maria Rosa Malisan; Anna Martinotti; Renzo Moretti; Barbara Nardiello; Caterina Oliviero; Stefania Clemente; Pietro Mancosu
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 10.  Gastrointestinal radiation injury: symptoms, risk factors and mechanisms.

Authors:  Abobakr K Shadad; Frank J Sullivan; Joseph D Martin; Laurence J Egan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.