Literature DB >> 16076698

Is screening for prostate cancer with prostate specific antigen an appropriate public health measure?

Peter C Albertsen1.   

Abstract

Screening and treatment for prostate cancer is controversial. In the absence of randomized trials, several prominent medical organizations in the United States and Europe have formulated policies that range from enthusiastic support to significant skepticism concerning the efficacy of screening and subsequent treatment for prostate cancer. Sharp rises in the incidence of prostate cancer have occurred whenever PSA testing has been introduced on a wide scale. Unfortunately, it is unclear whether declines in prostate cancer mortality can be attributed to PSA testing. Other explanations include the early use of anti-androgen therapy or changes in environmental factors such as diet. Repeated testing for serum PSA has produced significant shifts in the types of cases being identified and has raised the possibility of significant over-diagnosis of this disease. The European screening trial and the PLCO trial in the US will hopefully provide some insights into the value of population-based testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16076698     DOI: 10.1080/02841860410002815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  2 in total

Review 1.  Cost analysis of screening for, diagnosing, and staging prostate cancer based on a systematic review of published studies.

Authors:  Donatus U Ekwueme; Leonardo A Stroud; Yanjing Chen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  The accuracy of prostate cancer localization diagnosed on transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy compared to 3-dimensional transperineal approach.

Authors:  Kevin Krughoff; Khadijah Eid; Jason Phillips; Diliana Stoimenova; Daniel Smith; Colin O'Donnell; E David Crawford; Al Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2013-12-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.